Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393758›Full record

ArticleScientific data2020

Pofatu, a curated and open-access database for geochemical sourcing of archaeological materials.

Aymeric Hermann, Robert Forkel, Andrew McAlister, Arden Cruickshank, Mark Golitko, Brendan Kneebone, Mark McCoy, Christian Reepmeyer, Peter Sheppard, John Sinton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aymeric HermannDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745, Jena, Thüringen, Germany. hermann@shh.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-0294
Robert ForkelDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745, Jena, Thüringen, Germany. forkel@shh.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-086X
Andrew McAlisterDepartment of Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6653-6081
Arden CruickshankCFG Heritage Ltd, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Mark GolitkoDepartment of Anthropology, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, 46556, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3570-9899
Brendan KneeboneCFG Heritage Ltd, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0953-2527
Mark McCoyDepartment of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, 75205, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-1579
Christian ReepmeyerCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, 4878, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3257-0898
Peter SheppardDepartment of Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-7856
John SintonDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Hawai'i, 96822, USA.
Marshall WeislerSchool of Social Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2336-2544

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compositional analyses have long been used to determine the geological sources of artefacts. Geochemical "fingerprinting" of artefacts and sources is the most effective way to reconstruct strategies of raw material and artefact procurement, exchange or interaction systems, and mobility patterns during prehistory. The efficacy and popularity of geochemical sourcing has led to many projects using various analytical techniques to produce independent datasets. In order to facilitate access to this growing body of data and to promote comparability and reproducibility in provenance studies, we designed Pofatu, the first online and open-access database to present geochemical compositions and contextual information for archaeological sources and artefacts in a form that can be readily accessed by the scientific community. This relational database currently contains 7759 individual samples from archaeological sites and geological sources across the Pacific Islands. Each sample is comprehensively documented and includes elemental and isotopic compositions, detailed archaeological provenance, and supporting analytical metadata, such as sampling processes, analytical procedures, and quality control.

Identifiers

PMID32393758
PMCPMC7214434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.