Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393628›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

The Noise Collector for sparse recovery in high dimensions.

Miguel Moscoso, Alexei Novikov, George Papanicolaou, Chrysoula Tsogka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel MoscosoDepartment of Mathematics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Madrid 28911, Spain; moscoso@math.uc3m.es papanicolaou@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8461-1578
Alexei NovikovDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
George PapanicolaouDepartment of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; moscoso@math.uc3m.es papanicolaou@stanford.edu.
Chrysoula TsogkaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of California, Merced, CA 95343.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-8889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to detect sparse signals from noisy, high-dimensional data is a top priority in modern science and engineering. It is well known that a sparse solution of the linear system [Formula: see text] can be found efficiently with an [Formula: see text]-norm minimization approach if the data are noiseless. However, detection of the signal from data corrupted by noise is still a challenging problem as the solution depends, in general, on a regularization parameter with optimal value that is not easy to choose. We propose an efficient approach that does not require any parameter estimation. We introduce a no-phantom weight τ and the Noise Collector matrix C and solve an augmented system [Formula: see text], where e is the noise. We show that the [Formula: see text]-norm minimal solution of this system has zero false discovery rate for any level of noise, with probability that tends to one as the dimension of [Formula: see text] increases to infinity. We obtain exact support recovery if the noise is not too large and develop a fast Noise Collector algorithm, which makes the computational cost of solving the augmented system comparable with that of the original one. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in applications to passive array imaging.

Indexed as

convex geometryhigh-dimensional probabilitynoisy datasparsity-promoting algorithms

Identifiers

PMID32393628
PMCPMC7260980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.