Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393523›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2020

DMARD-free remission as novel treatment target in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review of achievability and sustainability.

M Verstappen, E van Mulligen, P H P de Jong, A H M van der Helm-Van Mil

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Verstappen *Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands elise.vanmulligen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-5063
E van Mulligen *Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1900-790X
P H P de JongDepartment of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A H M van der Helm-Van MilDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-1437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough current treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suggest tapering disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), it is unclear whether DMARD-free remission (DFR) is an achievable and sustainable outcome. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature to determine the prevalence and sustainability of DFR and evaluated potential predictors for DFR.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in March 2019 in multiple databases. All clinical trials and observational studies reporting on discontinuation of DMARDs in RA patients in remission were included. Our quality assessment included a general assessment and assessment of the description of DFR. Prevalence of DFR and its sustainability and flares during tapering and after DMARD stop were summarised. Also, potential predictors for achieving DFR were reviewed.

resultsFrom 631 articles, 51 were included, comprising 14 clinical trials and 5 observational studies. DFR definition differed, especially for the duration of DMARD-free state. Considering only high- and moderate-quality studies, DFR was achieved in 5.0%-24.3% and sustained DFR (duration>12 months) in 11.6%-19.4% (both relative to the number of patients eligible for tapering). Flares occurred frequently during DMARD tapering (41.8%-75.0%) and in the first year after achieving DFR (10.4%-11.8%), while late flares, >1 year after DMARD-stop, were infrequent (0.3%-3.5%). Many patient characteristics lacked association with DFR. Absence of autoantibodies and shared epitope alleles increased the chance of achieving DFR.

conclusionsDFR is achievable in RA and is sustainable in ~10%-20% of patients. DFR can become an important outcome measure for clinical trials and requires consistency in the definition. Considering the high rate of flares in the first year after DMARD stop, a DMARD-free follow-up of >12 months is advisable to evaluate sustainability.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidClinical Trials as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInduction ChemotherapyObservational Studies as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexSymptom Flare UpTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWithholding TreatmentAntirheumatic Agentsdisease flareDMARD-free remissionrheumatoid arthritistapering

Identifiers

PMID32393523
PMCPMC7299506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.