Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393379›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2020

DNA methylation changes during preimplantation development reveal inter-species differences and reprogramming events at imprinted genes.

Elena Ivanova, Sebastian Canovas, Soledad Garcia-Martínez, Raquel Romar, Jordana S Lopes, Dimitrios Rizos, Maria J Sanchez-Calabuig, Felix Krueger, Simon Andrews, Fernando Perez-Sanz and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena IvanovaEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Sebastian CanovasPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Soledad Garcia-MartínezPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Raquel RomarPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Jordana S LopesPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Dimitrios RizosDepartamento Reproducción Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Maria J Sanchez-CalabuigDepartamento Reproducción Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Felix KruegerBioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Simon AndrewsBioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Fernando Perez-SanzInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, IMIB-Arrixaca-UMU, 30120, Murcia, Spain.
Gavin KelseyEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK. gavin.kelsey@babraham.ac.uk.
Pilar CoyPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain. pcoy@um.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-1890
Babraham Institute · GBInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESCentro Regional de Selección y Reproducción Animal · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preimplantation embryos experience profound resetting of epigenetic information inherited from the gametes. Genome-wide analysis at single-base resolution has shown similarities but also species differences between human and mouse preimplantation embryos in DNA methylation patterns and reprogramming. Here, we have extended such analysis to two key livestock species, the pig and the cow. We generated genome-wide DNA methylation and whole-transcriptome datasets from gametes to blastocysts in both species. In oocytes from both species, a distinctive bimodal methylation landscape is present, with hypermethylated domains prevalent over hypomethylated domains, similar to human, while in the mouse the proportions are reversed.An oocyte-like pattern of methylation persists in the cleavage stages, albeit with some reduction in methylation level, persisting to blastocysts in cow, while pig blastocysts have a highly hypomethylated landscape. In the pig, there was evidence of transient de novo methylation at the 8-16 cell stages of domains unmethylated in oocytes, revealing a complex dynamic of methylation reprogramming. The methylation datasets were used to identify germline differentially methylated regions (gDMRs) of known imprinted genes and for the basis of detection of novel imprinted loci. Strikingly in the pig, we detected a consistent reduction in gDMR methylation at the 8-16 cell stages, followed by recovery to the blastocyst stage, suggesting an active period of imprint stabilization in preimplantation embryos. Transcriptome analysis revealed absence of expression in oocytes of both species of ZFP57, a key factor in the mouse for gDMR methylation maintenance, but presence of the alternative imprint regulator ZNF445. In conclusion, our study reveals species differences in DNA methylation reprogramming and suggests that porcine or bovine models may be closer to human in key aspects than in the mouse model.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingAnimalsBlastocystCattleGene ExpressionGerm CellsHumansMiceOocytesPromoter Regions, GeneticSpecies SpecificitySwineDNA methylationEmbryoEpigeneticImprinting

Identifiers

PMID32393379
PMCPMC7216732
OpenAlexW3026713970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.