Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393361›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2020

Acceptability of donor breastmilk banking among health workers: a cross-sectional survey in Zimbabwean urban settings.

Dexter T Chagwena, Felistas Mugariri, Bhekimpilo Sithole, Steady Faith Mataga, Ruvimbo Danda, Tonderayi M Matsungo, Charles C Maponga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human Milk for Vulnerable Infants: Breastfeeding and Milk Sharing Practice among Ghanaian Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dexter T ChagwenaSchool of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. tungadex@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7985-2924
Felistas MugaririInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Family Sciences, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Bhekimpilo SitholeNutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Steady Faith MatagaMinistry of Health and Child Care, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Ruvimbo DandaUNICEF, 6 Fairbridge Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tonderayi M MatsungoInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Family Sciences, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Charles C MapongaSchool of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZW

Funding

Antiretroviral Pharmacology Training in Resource Poor CountriesD43TW007991 · FIC · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MORSE, GENE D. · 2009 to 2015
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that donor human milk is superior to artificial infant formula in situations where the baby cannot feed on the mother's breastmilk. The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptability of donor human milk banking among health workers in Zimbabwean urban settings.

methodsA cross sectional study was conducted among 535 health workers and 15 key informants. Three referral hospitals were purposively selected and systematic random sampling was used to select the health workers. The study was conducted between October 2017 and October 2018.

resultsThe concept of donor human milk banking was acceptable among health workers. One-third (31%) of the study participants reported that they would accept donor breastmilk for their children while 56% of them would encourage their clients to donate breastmilk. Acceptance of donor human milk banking was associated with a high level of knowledge on breastmilk banks (p = 0.009) and the study participants' health profession (p = 0.001). Clinical staff were more receptive to donor human milk banking compared to non-clinical health workers. Donor human milk banking was not associated with religion (p = 0.498) or marital status (p = 0.714).

conclusionsThe results showed that health workers and policy informers would accept the establishment of breastmilk banks subject to resource availability. Commitment to the establishment of breastmilk banks was moderately acceptable among opinion leaders responsible for spearheading health and nutrition policies.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMilk BanksCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMilk, HumanMothersUrban PopulationZimbabweBreastfeedingBreastmilk banksHealth workersKnowledgeUrban settingZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID32393361
PMCPMC7216340
OpenAlexW3027051833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.