ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020
Clinical implementation of MRI-based organs-at-risk auto-segmentation with convolutional networks for prostate radiotherapy.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-enhanced image registration for accelerating daily adaptive magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Step-by-step assessment of MRI-only workflow in pelvic radiotherapy: feasibility and practical implementation.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence-based contouring of cardiac substructures on computed tomography scans for radiation therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Automatic head and neck tumor segmentation through deep learning and Bayesian optimization on three-dimensional medical images.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Can Deep Learning-Based Auto-Contouring Software Achieve Accurate Pelvic Volume Delineation in Volumetric Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer? A Preliminary Multicentric Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Clinical implementation of patient-specific quality assurance for synthetic computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted volume isotropic simultaneous interleaved bright- and black-blood examination for brain metastases.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation of Organs at Risk in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Deep learning based clinical target volumes contouring for prostate cancer: Easy and efficient application.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of limbus artificial intelligence software to augment contouring for prostate and nodes radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- The use of deep learning in interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): A review with a focus on open source and open data.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Review
- Automatic AI-based contouring of prostate MRI for online adaptive radiotherapy.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Essentially unedited deep-learning-based OARs are suitable for rigorous oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer treatment planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Organ Delineation for Radiation Treatment Planning of Prostate Cancer on Computed Tomography.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Investigation of autosegmentation techniques on T2-weighted MRI for off-line dose reconstruction in MR-linac workflow for head and neck cancers.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Synthesizing Efficiency Tools in Radiotherapy to Increase Patient Flow: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Review
- Effects of machine learning-based clinical decision support systems on decision-making, care delivery, and patient outcomes: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Prior knowledge based deep learning auto-segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- A geometry and dose-volume based performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructure delineation is a necessary, yet time-consuming manual procedure in radiotherapy. Recently, convolutional neural networks have been proposed to speed-up and automatise this procedure, obtaining promising results. With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy, MR-based segmentation is becoming increasingly relevant. However, the majority of the studies investigated automatic contouring based on computed tomography (CT). PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate the feasibility of clinical use of deep learning-based automatic OARs delineation on MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included 150 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent MR-only radiotherapy. A three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted dual spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence was acquired with 3T MRI for the generation of the synthetic-CT. The first 48 patients were included in a feasibility study training two 3D convolutional networks called DeepMedic and dense V-net (dV-net) to segment bladder, rectum and femurs. A research version of an atlas-based software was considered for comparison. Dice similarity coefficient, 95% Hausdorff distances (HD
resultsDeepMedic, dV-net and the atlas-based software generated contours in 60 s, 4 s and 10-15 min, respectively. Performances were higher for both the networks compared to the atlas-based software. The qualitative analysis demonstrated that delineation from DeepMedic required fewer adaptations, followed by dV-net and the atlas-based software. DeepMedic was clinically implemented. After retraining DeepMedic and testing on the successive patients, the performances slightly improved.
conclusionHigh conformality for OARs delineation was achieved with two in-house trained networks, obtaining a significant speed-up of the delineation procedure. Comparison of different approaches has been performed leading to the succesful adoption of one of the neural networks, DeepMedic, in the clinical workflow. DeepMedic maintained in a clinical setting the accuracy obtained in the feasibility study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.