Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393280›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2020

Clinical implementation of MRI-based organs-at-risk auto-segmentation with convolutional networks for prostate radiotherapy.

Mark H F Savenije, Matteo Maspero, Gonda G Sikkes, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp, Alexis N T J Kotte, Gijsbert H Bol, Cornelis A T van den Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark H F SavenijeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Matteo MasperoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands. m.maspero@umcutrecht.nl.
Gonda G SikkesDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Alexis N T J KotteDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Gijsbert H BolDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergDepartment of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructure delineation is a necessary, yet time-consuming manual procedure in radiotherapy. Recently, convolutional neural networks have been proposed to speed-up and automatise this procedure, obtaining promising results. With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy, MR-based segmentation is becoming increasingly relevant. However, the majority of the studies investigated automatic contouring based on computed tomography (CT). PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate the feasibility of clinical use of deep learning-based automatic OARs delineation on MRI. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 150 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who underwent MR-only radiotherapy. A three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted dual spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence was acquired with 3T MRI for the generation of the synthetic-CT. The first 48 patients were included in a feasibility study training two 3D convolutional networks called DeepMedic and dense V-net (dV-net) to segment bladder, rectum and femurs. A research version of an atlas-based software was considered for comparison. Dice similarity coefficient, 95% Hausdorff distances (HD

resultsDeepMedic, dV-net and the atlas-based software generated contours in 60 s, 4 s and 10-15 min, respectively. Performances were higher for both the networks compared to the atlas-based software. The qualitative analysis demonstrated that delineation from DeepMedic required fewer adaptations, followed by dV-net and the atlas-based software. DeepMedic was clinically implemented. After retraining DeepMedic and testing on the successive patients, the performances slightly improved.

conclusionHigh conformality for OARs delineation was achieved with two in-house trained networks, obtaining a significant speed-up of the delineation procedure. Comparison of different approaches has been performed leading to the succesful adoption of one of the neural networks, DeepMedic, in the clinical workflow. DeepMedic maintained in a clinical setting the accuracy obtained in the feasibility study.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrgans at RiskProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedArtificial intelligenceContouringDeep learningDelineationMagnetic resonance imagingMR-only treatment planningProstate cancerRadiotherapySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID32393280
PMCPMC7216473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.