Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393247›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2020

Use of outpatient medical care by headache patients in Germany: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Britta Müller, Thomas Dresler, Charly Gaul, Tim Jürgens, Peter Kropp, Anna Rehfeld, Olaf Reis, Ruth Ruscheweyh, Andreas Straube, Stefanie Förderreuther

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 21st century headache: mapping new territory.The journal of headache and pain · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Britta MüllerInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medicine Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, D-18147, Rostock, Germany. britta.mueller@med.uni-rostock.de.
Thomas DreslerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Charly GaulMigraine and Headache Clinic Königstein, Königstein, Germany.
Tim JürgensDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Peter KroppInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medicine Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, D-18147, Rostock, Germany.
Anna RehfeldInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medicine Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, D-18147, Rostock, Germany.
Olaf ReisClinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Ruth RuscheweyhDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas StraubeDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie FörderreutherDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMigräne Klinik Königstein · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG e.V., http://dmkg.de/). N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache sufferers in need of professional health care often do not utilize the care available, and factors influencing headache-specific physician consultation are not yet understood. Objectives of this study are (1) to assess self-reported headache-specific physician consultations and (2) to identify headache-related and sociodemographic predictors.

methodsData of a random sample of the general population in Germany aged ≥14 years were analyzed (N = 2461). A multivariate binary logistic regression was conducted to identify a parsimonious model to predict physician consultation.

results50.7% of the participants with headache reported at least one headache-specific physician consultation during lifetime. Of these, 53.6% had seen one, 26.1% two, and 20.3% more than two physicians because of their headaches. The odds of physician consultation increased with the number of headache days per month (HDM) [(reference HDM < 1) HDM 1-3 (OR = 2.29), HDM 4-14 (OR = 2.41), and HDM ≥15 (OR = 4.83)] and increasing Headache Impact Test score (HIT-6) [(reference "no or little impact") moderate impact (OR = 1.74), substantial impact (OR = 3.01), and severe impact (OR = 5.08)]. Middle-aged participants were more likely to have consulted than younger and older ones [(reference 14-34 years) 35-54 years (OR = 1.90), 55-74 years (OR = 1.96), ≥75 years (OR = 1.02)]. The odds of physician consultation among self-employed subjects were lower than among employed manual workers (OR = 0.48). The living environment (rural versus urban) did not have an influence on the consultation frequency.

conclusionThe results indicate that apart from burden-related factors (headache frequency; headache impact), health care utilization patterns are also influenced by patients' occupational status and age. Further research is needed to analyze whether the lower consultation rate means that the self-employed have a higher risk of chronification or that they have more effective self-management strategies regarding headache.

Indexed as

OutpatientsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationYoung AdultHeadacheHeadache-specific physician consultationPatients’ occupational statusPopulation-based study

Identifiers

PMID32393247
PMCPMC7212612
OpenAlexW3028375583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.