Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393242›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Communication skills of medical students: survey of self- and external perception in a longitudinally based trend study.

Joachim Graf, Teresa Loda, Stephan Zipfel, Annette Wosnik, Daniela Mohr, Anne Herrmann-Werner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of the Structured Consent Process Using Modified Delphi Technique with the Standard Process in Obtaining Informed Consent for Procedures in ENT by PHASE III MBBS Students.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joachim GrafUniversity Hospital Tuebingen, Institute for Health Sciences, Section of Midwifery Science, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 9, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Teresa LodaInternal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. teresa.loda@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-1757
Stephan ZipfelInternal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Annette WosnikMedical Faculty Tuebingen, Dean's Office for Students' Affairs, Geissweg 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Daniela MohrMedical Faculty Tuebingen, Dean's Office for Students' Affairs, Geissweg 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Anne Herrmann-WernerInternal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs good communication skills are crucial for doctor-patient interactions, it is recommended to incorporate them in medical school programs from the very beginning. On this basis medical schools in Germany introduced the OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) to examine and by this foster learning of communication skills as assessment drives learning. The aim of the study was to examine the development of the communication skills of medical students during an OSCE to investigate how communication competence has developed between different student cohorts.

methodsThis study is a longitudinal trend study based on seven semester-cohorts, examining the communication skills of medical students in the OSCE both from the perspective of students and from the viewpoint of standardized patients (SP). Altogether, 1027 students from seven semester cohorts were asked to rate their own communication skills (self-perception) before the OSCE exam started. Here, sub-analyses were performed to outline a potential influence of previous history-taking group participation. The SP evaluated the students' communication skills in external perception during the OSCE exam at each station with history-taking or physical examinations. The communication skills in both groups were ascertained in the dimensions of empathy, content structure, verbal expression, and non-verbal expression.

resultsOnly in the dimension of non-verbal expression could a statistically significant change be found in students' self-perception over the years. Notably, the rating of communication skills as self-rated by the students has risen constantly, whereas they deteriorated from the perspective of standardized patients (SP). It has also been found that previous history-taking courses have a positive influence on the structural dimension of communication skills in particular.

conclusionsThe results of this study support conclusions of other studies which also suggest differences between self- and external perception of medical students' communication skills. Nevertheless, students showed good overall communication skills in the four dimensions of empathy, content structure, verbal expression, and non-verbal expression, as demonstrated in a longitudinal trend study over seven semesters. However, we noted that externally rated empathy levels declined over the semester cohorts, suggesting the need for new priorities to be set in student teaching.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationEducational MeasurementPatient SimulationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCommunication skillsEmpathyOSCESelf- and external perceptionTrend study

Identifiers

PMID32393242
PMCPMC7216673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.