Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393231›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

An exploration of the experiences of professionals supporting patients approaching the end of life in medicines management at home. A qualitative study.

Eleanor Wilson, Glenys Caswell, Asam Latif, Claire Anderson, Christina Faull, Kristian Pollock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor WilsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Eleanor.wilson@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-5901
Glenys CaswellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Asam LatifSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Claire AndersonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Christina FaullLOROS Hospice, Leicester, UK.
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBHospice UK · GB

Funding

Department of Health 15/70/101Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 15/70/101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of medicines towards the end of life can place increasing burdens and responsibilities on patients and families. This has received little attention yet it can be a source of great difficulty and distress patients and families. Dose administration aids can be useful for some patients but there is no evidence for their wide spread use or the implications for their use as patients become increasing unwell. The study aimed to explore how healthcare professionals describe the support they provide for patients to manage medications at home at end of life.

methodsQualitative interview study with thematic analysis. Participants were a purposive sample of 40 community healthcare professionals (including GPs, pharmacists, and specialist palliative care and community nurses) from across two English counties.

resultsHealthcare professionals reported a variety of ways in which they tried to support patients to take medications as prescribed. While the paper presents some solutions and strategies reported by professional respondents it was clear from both professional and patient/family caregiver accounts in the wider study that rather few professionals provided this kind of support. Standard solutions offered included: rationalising the number of medications; providing different formulations; explaining what medications were for and how best to take them. Dose administration aids were also regularly provided, and while useful for some, they posed a number of practical difficulties for palliative care. More challenging circumstances such as substance misuse and memory loss required more innovative strategies such as supporting ways to record medication taking; balancing restricted access to controlled drugs and appropriate pain management and supporting patient choice in medication use.

conclusionsThe burdens and responsibilities of managing medicines at home for patients approaching the end of life has not been widely recognised or understood. This paper considers some of the strategies reported by professionals in the study, and points to the great potential for a more widely proactive stance in supporting patients and family carers to understand and take their medicines effectively. By adopting tailored, and sometimes, 'outside the box' thinking professionals can identify immediate, simple solutions to the problems patients and families experience with managing medicines.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHome Care ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedication SystemsMiddle AgedPain ManagementQualitative ResearchTerminal CareDose administration aidsEnd of life careHealthcare professionalsManaging medicationPatientsPharmacyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32393231
PMCPMC7216477
OpenAlexW3022544675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.