Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32393188›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Intentions to use maternity waiting homes and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia.

Mekonen Endayehu, Mezgebu Yitayal, Ayal Debie

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mekonen EndayehuEast Bellesa District Health Office, North Gondar Zone, Amhara National Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Mezgebu YitayalDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P. O. Box, 196, Gondar, Ethiopia. mezgebuy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9206-9528
Ayal DebieDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P. O. Box, 196, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternity Waiting Homes (MWHs) are residential facilities located within hospitals or health centers to accommodate women in their final weeks of pregnancy to bridge the geographical gap in obstetric care. Little is known, however, about women's intentions to use MWHs. Thus, this study aimed to assess pregnant women's intentions to use MWHs and associated factors in East Bellesa district, northwest Ethiopia.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 525 pregnant women in East Bellesa district from March to May 2018. Study participants were selected using systematic random sampling. Binary logistic regression was used for analysis. Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI), and p-value < 0.05 were used to identify factors associated with intentions to use MWHs.

resultsIn the study area, 326/499 (65.3%) pregnant women had the intention to use MWHs. Pregnant women who had good knowledge about maternal healthcare and obstetric complications (aOR 6.40; 95% CI 3.6-11.5), positive subjective norms related to women's perceptions of social pressure (aOR 5.14; 95% CI 2.9-9.2), positive perceived behavioral control of women on the extent to which women feel confident (aOR 4.74; 95% CI 2.7-8.4), rich wealth status (aOR 4.21; 95% CI 2.1-8.4), women who decided by themselves to use maternal services (aOR 2.74; 95% CI 1.2-6.2), attended antenatal care (aOR 2.24; 95% CI 1.2-4.1) and favorable attitudes towards women's overall evaluation of MWHs (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.0-3.4) had higher odds of intentions to use MWHs.

conclusionTwo thirds (65.3%) of pregnant women had intentions to use MWHs. Factors such as women's knowledge, subjective norms related to women's perceptions of social pressure, perceived behavioral control of women on the extent to which women feel confident to utilize, and wealth status, decision-making power, attending antenatal care and attitude towards women's overall evaluation of MWHs were significantly associated with the intention to use MWHs. Therefore, improving women's awareness by providing continuous health education during antenatal care visits, devising strategies to improve women's wealth status, and strengthening decision-making power may enhance their intention to use MWHs.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEthiopiaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultMaternity waiting homeNorthwest Ethiopia

Identifiers

PMID32393188
PMCPMC7216713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.