ArticleBMC genomics2020
Assessment of databases to determine the validity of β- and γ-carbonic anhydrase sequences from vertebrates.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cloning, characterization, and inhibition of the novel β-carbonic anhydrase from parasitic blood fluke,Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Genome Study of α-, β-, and γ-Carbonic Anhydrases from the Thermophilic Microbiome of Marine Hydrothermal Vent Ecosystems.Biology · 2023Article
- An insight overview on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Advantageous, pharmacology, mechanism of action, and prospective considerations.International immunopharmacology · 2023Review
- A reverse vaccinology approach on transmembrane carbonic anhydrases from Plasmodium species as vaccine candidates for malaria prevention.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Application of beta and gamma carbonic anhydrase sequences as tools for identification of bacterial contamination in the whole genome sequence of inbred Wuzhishan minipig (Sus scrofa) annotated in databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Article
- In Silico Investigation of Potential Applications of Gamma Carbonic Anhydrases as Catalysts of COInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Molecular Characterization of Carbonic Anhydrase II (CA II) and Its Potential Involvement in Regulating Shell Formation in the Pacific Abalone,Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Application of System Biology to Explore the Association of Neprilysin, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2), and Carbonic Anhydrase (CA) in Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2.Biological procedures online · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe inaccuracy of DNA sequence data is becoming a serious problem, as the amount of molecular data is multiplying rapidly and expectations are high for big data to revolutionize life sciences and health care. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of DNA sequence data from commonly used databases using carbonic anhydrase (CA) gene sequences as generic targets. CAs are ancient metalloenzymes that are present in all unicellular and multicellular living organisms. Among the eight distinct families of CAs, including α, β, γ, δ, ζ, η, θ, and ι, only α-CAs have been reported in vertebrates.
resultsBy an in silico analysis performed on the NCBI and Ensembl databases, we identified several β- and γ-CA sequences in vertebrates, including Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Felis catus, Lipotes vexillifer, Pantholops hodgsonii, Hippocampus comes, Hucho hucho, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Xenopus tropicalis, and Rhinolophus sinicus. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of genomic DNA persistently failed to amplify positive β- or γ-CA gene sequences when Mus musculus and Felis catus DNA samples were used as templates. Further BLAST homology searches of the database-derived "vertebrate" β- and γ-CA sequences revealed that the identified sequences were presumably derived from gut microbiota, environmental microbiomes, or grassland ecosystems.
conclusionsOur results highlight the need for more accurate and fast curation systems for DNA databases. The mined data must be carefully reconciled with our best knowledge of sequences to improve the accuracy of DNA data for publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.