Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392871›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

"They Reckon They're Man's Best Friend and I Believe That." Understanding Relationships with Dogs in Australian Aboriginal Communities to Inform Effective Dog Population Management.

Gemma C Ma, Jason Ford, Lillian Lucas, Jacqueline M Norris, Jessica Spencer, Ann-Margret Withers, Michael P Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. One Health and Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: A One Health Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. One Health in Indigenous Communities: A Critical Review of the Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gemma C MaSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, the University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-7014
Jason FordRepresentative of the Ngemba Nation, Cobar 2835, Australia.
Lillian LucasRegional Enterprise Development Institute Ltd. (REDI.E), Dubbo 2830, Australia.
Jacqueline M NorrisSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, the University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0003-6930
Jessica SpencerNSW Health, Aboriginal Environmental Health Unit, Dubbo 2830, Australia.
Ann-Margret WithersRSPCA NSW, Yagoona 2199, Australia.
Michael P WardSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, the University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-4986
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs are important companions to people in many societies; however, dogs can also be associated with risks to public health and safety. Dog population management is therefore an important consideration globally. This study aimed to better understand the role of dogs in Aboriginal communities and the barriers to accessing veterinary services. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 85 dog owners from nine Aboriginal communities across New South Wales, Australia. Many positive aspects of dog ownership were identified and few negatives. Dogs are considered an important part of family and community life and many dogs are allowed indoors (63.4%), even sharing beds with their owners. Most dogs were kept for companionship (84.7%) and/or as guard dogs (45.9%) and all respondents considered their dog part of their family. However, respondents had low levels of engagement with mainstream veterinary services, and many respondents identified significant barriers to accessing veterinary services, especially cost and transport. This study demonstrates the important and positive role of dogs in Aboriginal families and communities but also highlights a significant veterinary service gap. Our findings demonstrate that different perspectives on the role of dogs necessitates a different, culturally inclusive approach to dog management interventions.

Indexed as

Aboriginalcompanion animaldogdog population management

Identifiers

PMID32392871
PMCPMC7278576
OpenAlexW3021591793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.