Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392856›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Characterization of the Plant Growth-Promoting Activities of Endophytic Fungi Isolated from

Adiyadolgor Turbat, Dávid Rakk, Aruna Vigneshwari, Sándor Kocsubé, Huynh Thu, Ágnes Szepesi, László Bakacsy, Biljana D Škrbić, Enkh-Amgalan Jigjiddorj, Csaba Vágvölgyi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diversity of Endophytes ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Incorporating omics-based tools into endophytic fungal research.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adiyadolgor TurbatDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2072-9689
Dávid RakkDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Aruna VigneshwariDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8131-1518
Sándor KocsubéDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Huynh ThuDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Ágnes SzepesiDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-4857
László BakacsyDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2593-1795
Biljana D ŠkrbićFaculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-8989
Enkh-Amgalan JigjiddorjLaboratory of Microbiology, Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Mongolian Academy of Science, Ulaanbaatar 13330, Mongolia.
Csaba VágvölgyiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0009-7773
András SzekeresDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1651-4623

Funding

Hungarian Government and the European Union GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytic fungi in symbiotic association with their host plant are well known to improve plant growth and reduce the adverse effects of both biotic and abiotic stresses. Therefore, fungal endophytes are beginning to receive increased attention in an effort to find growth-promoting strains that could be applied to enhance crop yield and quality. In our study, the plant growth-promoting activities of endophytic fungi isolated from various parts of

Indexed as

endophytic fungiIAA (indole-acetic-acid) productionplant growth-promoting activities

Identifiers

PMID32392856
PMCPMC7284388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.