Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392821›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Form-Vessel Classification of Cholangioscopy Findings to Diagnose Biliary Tract Carcinoma's Superficial Spread.

Yoshimitsu Fukasawa, Shinichi Takano, Mitsuharu Fukasawa, Shinya Maekawa, Makoto Kadokura, Hiroko Shindo, Ei Takahashi, Sumio Hirose, Satoshi Kawakami, Hiroshi Hayakawa and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Choledochoscopy: An update.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshimitsu FukasawaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Shinichi TakanoFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Mitsuharu FukasawaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Shinya MaekawaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Makoto KadokuraFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Hiroko ShindoFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Ei TakahashiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Sumio HiroseFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Satoshi KawakamiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Hiroshi HayakawaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Tatsuya YamaguchiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Yasuhiro NakayamaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Taisuke InoueFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Tadashi SatoFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
Nobuyuki EnomotoFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan.
University of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP15K09044Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18K07999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate a newly developed peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) classification system by comparing classified lesions with histological and genetic findings. We analyzed 30 biopsied specimens from 11 patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) who underwent POCS. An original classification of POCS findings was made based on the biliary surface's form (F factor, 4 grades) and vessel structure (V-factor, 3 grades). Findings were then compared with those of corresponding biopsy specimens analyzed histologically and by next-generation sequencing to identify somatic mutations. In addition, the histology of postoperative surgical stumps and preoperative POCS findings were compared. Histological malignancy rate in biopsied specimens increased with increasing F- and V-factor scores (F1, 0%; F1, 25%; F3, 50%; F4, 62.5%;

Indexed as

MutationAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsBiopsyEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSequence Analysis, DNAbile duct cancerbiopsycholangioscopegenetic mutationtumor spread

Identifiers

PMID32392821
PMCPMC7246671
OpenAlexW3022881846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.