Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392800›Full record

ReviewPolymers2020

Potential Natural Fiber Polymeric Nanobiocomposites: A Review.

K M Faridul Hasan, Péter György Horváth, Tibor Alpár

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Periquiteira (Polymers · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biosynthesis-Based AlBioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K M Faridul HasanSimonyi Károly Faculty of Engineering, University of Sopron, Sopron, 9400 Gyor, Hungary.
Péter György HorváthSimonyi Károly Faculty of Engineering, University of Sopron, Sopron, 9400 Gyor, Hungary.
Tibor AlpárSimonyi Károly Faculty of Engineering, University of Sopron, Sopron, 9400 Gyor, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composite materials reinforced with biofibers and nanomaterials are becoming considerably popular, especially for their light weight, strength, exceptional stiffness, flexural rigidity, damping property, longevity, corrosion, biodegradability, antibacterial, and fire-resistant properties. Beside the traditional thermoplastic and thermosetting polymers, nanoparticles are also receiving attention in terms of their potential to improve the functionality and mechanical performances of biocomposites. These remarkable characteristics have made nanobiocomposite materials convenient to apply in aerospace, mechanical, construction, automotive, marine, medical, packaging, and furniture industries, through providing environmental sustainability. Nanoparticles (TiO

Indexed as

biocompositesbiofiberfunctionalitynanobiocompositesnanofillerpolymerreinforcements

Identifiers

PMID32392800
PMCPMC7284945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.