Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392787›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Precision Diagnostics by Affinity-Mass Spectrometry: A Novel Approach for Fetal Growth Restriction Screening During Pregnancy.

Charles A Okai, Manuela Russ, Manja Wölter, Kristin Andresen, Werner Rath, Michael O Glocker, Ulrich Pecks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epigenetic Modifications at the Center of the Barker Hypothesis and Their Transgenerational Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles A OkaiProteome Center Rostock, University Medicine and Natural Science Faculty, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Manuela RussProteome Center Rostock, University Medicine and Natural Science Faculty, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Manja WölterProteome Center Rostock, University Medicine and Natural Science Faculty, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Kristin AndresenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Werner RathDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Michael O GlockerProteome Center Rostock, University Medicine and Natural Science Faculty, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
Ulrich PecksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
University of Rostock · DEKlinikum Südstadt Rostock · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 91614177European Union ERASMUS + ROIASI 02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) affects about 3% to 8% of pregnancies, leading to higher perinatal mortality and morbidity. Current strategies for detecting fetal growth impairment are based on ultrasound inspections. However, antenatal detection rates are insufficient and critical in countries with substandard care. To overcome difficulties with detection and to better discriminate between high risk FGR and low risk small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses, we investigated the suitability of risk assessment based on the analysis of a recently developed proteome profile derived from maternal serum in different study groups. Maternal serum, collected at around 31 weeks of gestation, was analyzed in 30 FGR, 15 SGA, and 30 control (CTRL) pregnant women who delivered between 31 and 40 weeks of gestation. From the 75 pregnant women of this study, 2 were excluded because of deficient raw data and 2 patients could not be grouped due to indeterminate results. Consistency between proteome profile and sonography results was obtained for 59 patients (26 true positive and 33 true negative). Of the proteome profiling 12 contrarious grouped individuals, 3 were false negative and 9 were false positive cases with respect to ultrasound data. Both true positive and false positive grouping transfer the respective patients to closer surveillance and thorough pregnancy management. Accuracy of the test is considered high with an area-under-curve value of 0.88 in receiver-operator-characteristics analysis. Proteome profiling by affinity-mass spectrometry during pregnancy provides a reliable method for risk assessment of impaired development in fetuses and consumes just minute volumes of maternal peripheral blood. In addition to clinical testing proteome profiling by affinitymass spectrometry may improve risk assessment, referring pregnant women to specialists early, thereby improving perinatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Affinity-MSApolipoproteinsFGRPregnancy complicationsProteome profilingSGA

Identifiers

PMID32392787
PMCPMC7290972
OpenAlexW3023042162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.