ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2020
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor for the treatment of heart failure: a review of recent evidence.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is there sufficient evidence to justify changes in dietary habits in heart failure patients? A systematic review.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of early initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan in patients after acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- The Difference between Sacubitril Valsartan and Valsartan on Vascular Endothelial Function, APN, MMP-9, and BNP Levels in Patients with Hypertension and Chronic Heart Failure.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Trial
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor for osteoporosis risk in patients with heart failure.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- [Perioperative management of anesthesia in heart failure].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Review
- Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: comprehensive insights into pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Molecular mechanisms of sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac remodeling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Multi-Antigen Imaging Reveals Inflammatory DC, ADAM17 and Neprilysin as Effectors in Keloid Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a growing health concern in aging societies worldwide. Sacubitril/valsartan is changing the real-world treatment in the whole spectrum of HF. The beginning was the PARADIGM-HF trial published in 2014, which demonstrated the beneficial effects of inhibiting natriuretic peptide breakdown in combination with hindering the renin-angiotensin system in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction. Subsequent large-scale randomized trials have evaluated angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor in HF patients with acute decompensation or with preserved ejection fraction. The post hoc analyses are being conducted as well. This review summarizes the recent evidence of sacubitril/ valsartan regarding patient-centered outcomes, based on randomized controlled trials and their associated studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.