Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392468›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2020

Unraveling the Mysteries of Motivation.

Randall C O'Reilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The interoceptive origin of reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Romantic Jealousy, Cortisol, and Dark Chocolate.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational Mechanisms Underlying Motivation to Earn Symbolic Reinforcers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Emotions as computations.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Grounding Context in Embodied Cognitive Robotics.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Randall C O'ReillyDepartment of Psychology and Computer Science Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Ct, Davis, CA 95816, USA. Electronic address: oreilly@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

A Neurobiologically-based Neural Network Model of Risky Decision-makingR01GM109996 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MILLER, LYNN C, READ, STEPHEN J · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation plays a central role in human behavior and cognition but is not well captured by widely used artificial intelligence (AI) and computational modeling frameworks. This Opinion article addresses two central questions regarding the nature of motivation: what are the nature and dynamics of the internal goals that drive our motivational system and how can this system be sufficiently flexible to support our ability to rapidly adapt to novel situations, tasks, etc.? In reviewing existing systems and neuroscience research and theorizing on these questions, a wealth of insights to constrain the development of computational models of motivation can be found.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMotivationCognitionHumansPrefrontal Cortexanterior cingulate cortexcomputational modelsdorsolateral prefrontal cortexfrontostriatal loopsgoalsmotivationorbital frontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID32392468
PMCPMC7219631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.