ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020
Visual and Vestibular Integration Express Summative Eye Movement Responses and Reveal Higher Visual Acceleration Sensitivity than Previously Described.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human proprioceptive gaze stabilization during passive body rotations underneath a fixed head.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Temporal dynamics of ocular torsion and vertical vergence during visual, vestibular, and visuovestibular rotations.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Cervicocephalic kinaesthesia reveals novel subgroups of motor control impairments in patients with neck pain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Proposed Mechanism for Visual Vertigo: Post-Concussion Patients Have Higher Gain From Visual Input Into Subcortical Gaze Stabilization.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- The ground reaction force pattern during walking under vestibular-demanding task with/without mastoid vibration: implication for future sensorimotor training in astronauts.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Concussed patients with visually induced dizziness exhibit increased ocular torsion and vertical vergence during optokinetic gaze-stabilization.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023Article
- Conserved subcortical processing in visuo-vestibular gaze control.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Alertness and Visual Attention Impact Different Aspects of the Optokinetic Reflex.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Optokinetic stimulation induces vertical vergence, possibly through a non-visual pathway.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Assessing Otolith-Ocular Function With Video-Ocular Counter-Roll: Optimal Tilt Angles and Impact of Visual Inputs.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Acceleration plays a great impact on the vestibular system, but is attributed little influence over vision. This study aims to explore how visual and vestibular acceleration affect roll-plane oculomotor responses, including their addiative effect. Methods: Seated in a mechanical sled, 13 healthy volunteers (7 men, 6 women; mean age 25 years) were exposed to a series of visual (VIS) optokinetic, vestibular (VES) whole-body, and combined (VIS + VES) rotations. This was carried out at two acceleration intensities. Subjects wore a video-based eye tracker, enabling analysis of torsional and skewing eye movement responses, which were used to evaluate the individual response to each trial. The tracker also contained accelerometers allowing head tracking. Results: Both ocular torsion and vertical skewing were sensitive to acceleration intensities for VES and VIS + VES. For VIS only, skewing exhibited such a response. An increased acceleration yielded a decreased torsion-skewing ratio for VIS, explained by the change in skewing, but remained unchanged for VES and VIS + VES. Torsion exhibited particularly reliable summative effect, yielding a relative contribution of 32% VIS and 75% VES during low acceleration, and 19% and 85%, respectively, during high acceleration. Conclusions: The change in the skewing response to different intensities indicates that the visual system is more sensitive to visual accelerations than previously described. Eye movements showed reliable summative effects, indicating a robust visual-vestibular integration that indicates their integrative priorities for each acceleration, with the visual system being more involved during low accelerations. Such objective quantifications could hold clinical utility when assessing sensory mismatch in vertiginous patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.