Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392293›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020

A Likelihood Approach for Uncovering Selective Sweep Signatures from Haplotype Data.

Alexandre M Harris, Michael DeGiorgio

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.Human population genetics and genomics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Selection scans and downstream analysis with selscan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An ancient origin of the naked grains of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandre M HarrisDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Michael DeGiorgioDepartment of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.

Funding

Identifying complex modes of adaptation from population-genomic dataR35GM128590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Michael DeGiorgio · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective sweeps are frequent and varied signatures in the genomes of natural populations, and detecting them is consequently important in understanding mechanisms of adaptation by natural selection. Following a selective sweep, haplotypic diversity surrounding the site under selection decreases, and this deviation from the background pattern of variation can be applied to identify sweeps. Multiple methods exist to locate selective sweeps in the genome from haplotype data, but none leverages the power of a model-based approach to make their inference. Here, we propose a likelihood ratio test statistic T to probe whole-genome polymorphism data sets for selective sweep signatures. Our framework uses a simple but powerful model of haplotype frequency spectrum distortion to find sweeps and additionally make an inference on the number of presently sweeping haplotypes in a population. We found that the T statistic is suitable for detecting both hard and soft sweeps across a variety of demographic models, selection strengths, and ages of the beneficial allele. Accordingly, we applied the T statistic to variant calls from European and sub-Saharan African human populations, yielding primarily literature-supported candidates, including LCT, RSPH3, and ZNF211 in CEU, SYT1, RGS18, and NNT in YRI, and HLA genes in both populations. We also searched for sweep signatures in Drosophila melanogaster, finding expected candidates at Ace, Uhg1, and Pimet. Finally, we provide open-source software to compute the T statistic and the inferred number of presently sweeping haplotypes from whole-genome data.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalGenetic TechniquesModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticSoftwareAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHaplotypesHumanshaplotypemaximum likelihoodselective sweep

Identifiers

PMID32392293
PMCPMC7530616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.