ArticleJournal of vision2020
Effects of illumination on the categorization of shiny materials.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- The identification of materials from patterns of fluid flow.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Gloss discrimination: Toward an image-based perceptual model.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Orientation fields predict human perception of 3D shape from shading.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Material category of visual objects computed from specular image structure.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Aging and the perception of tactile speed.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Contours produced by internal specular interreflections provide visual information for the perception of glass materials.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- On the Ambient Optic Array: James Gibson's Insights About the Phenomenon of Chiaroscuro.i-PerceptionArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present research was designed to examine how patterns of illumination influence the perceptual categorization of metal, shiny black, and shiny white materials. The stimuli depicted three possible objects that were illuminated by five possible high-dynamic-range imaging light maps, which varied in their overall distributions of illuminant directions and intensities. The surfaces included a low roughness chrome material, a shiny black material, and a shiny white material with both diffuse and specular components. Observers rated each stimulus by adjusting four sliders to indicate their confidence that the depicted material was metal, shiny black, shiny white, or something else, and these adjustments were constrained so that the sum of all four settings was always 100%. The results revealed that the metal and shiny black categories are easily confused. For example, metal materials with low intensity light maps or a narrow range of illuminant directions are often judged as shiny black, whereas shiny black materials with high intensity light maps or a wide range of illuminant directions are often judged as metal. To discover the visual information on which these judgements are based, we measured several possible image statistics, and we found two that were highly correlated with the observers' confidence ratings in appropriate contexts. We also performed a spherical harmonic analysis on the different light maps to quantitatively predict how they would bias observers' judgments of metal and shiny black surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.