Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392248›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

PenDA, a rank-based method for personalized differential analysis: Application to lung cancer.

Magali Richard, Clémentine Decamps, Florent Chuffart, Elisabeth Brambilla, Sophie Rousseaux, Saadi Khochbin, Daniel Jost

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Personalized analysis of human cancer multi-omics for precision oncology.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Identifying cancer driver genes in individual tumours.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Magali RichardUniv Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3165-3218
Clémentine DecampsUniv Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-4961
Florent ChuffartCNRS UMR 5309, Inserm U1209, Univ Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.
Elisabeth BrambillaCHUGA, Inserm U1209, Univ Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.
Sophie RousseauxCNRS UMR 5309, Inserm U1209, Univ Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-5350
Saadi KhochbinCNRS UMR 5309, Inserm U1209, Univ Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-0857
Daniel JostUniv Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9877-6864
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hopes of precision medicine rely on our capacity to measure various high-throughput genomic information of a patient and to integrate them for personalized diagnosis and adapted treatment. Reaching these ambitious objectives will require the development of efficient tools for the detection of molecular defects at the individual level. Here, we propose a novel method, PenDA, to perform Personalized Differential Analysis at the scale of a single sample. PenDA is based on the local ordering of gene expressions within individual cases and infers the deregulation status of genes in a sample of interest compared to a reference dataset. Based on realistic simulations of RNA-seq data of tumors, we showed that PenDA outcompetes existing approaches with very high specificity and sensitivity and is robust to normalization effects. Applying the method to lung cancer cohorts, we observed that deregulated genes in tumors exhibit a cancer-type-specific commitment towards up- or down-regulation. Based on the individual information of deregulation given by PenDA, we were able to define two new molecular histologies for lung adenocarcinoma cancers strongly correlated to survival. In particular, we identified 37 biomarkers whose up-regulation lead to bad prognosis and that we validated on two independent cohorts. PenDA provides a robust, generic tool to extract personalized deregulation patterns that can then be used for the discovery of therapeutic targets and for personalized diagnosis. An open-access, user-friendly R package is available at https://github.com/bcm-uga/penda.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicHumansLung NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID32392248
PMCPMC7274464
OpenAlexW3023485287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.