Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32392223›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Occupational exposure to Brucella spp.: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carine Rodrigues Pereira, João Vitor Fernandes Cotrim de Almeida, Izabela Regina Cardoso de Oliveira, Luciana Faria de Oliveira, Luciano José Pereira, Márcio Gilberto Zangerônimo, Andrey Pereira Lage, Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Brucellosis Surveillance - United States, 2010-2024.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carine Rodrigues PereiraDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
João Vitor Fernandes Cotrim de AlmeidaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-7838
Izabela Regina Cardoso de OliveiraDepartamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luciana Faria de OliveiraPrograma Nacional de Controle e Erradicação da Brucelose e Tuberculose Animal, Instituto Mineiro de Agropecuária, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luciano José PereiraDepartamento de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Márcio Gilberto ZangerônimoDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Andrey Pereira LageDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Elaine Maria Seles DornelesDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-1296
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BREmpresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease of remarkable importance worldwide. The focus of this systematic review was to investigate occupational brucellosis and to identify the main infection risks for each group exposed to the pathogen. Seven databases were used to identify papers related to occupational brucellosis: CABI, Cochrane, Pubmed, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. The search resulted in 6123 studies, of which 63 were selected using the quality assessment tools guided from National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Case Report Guidelines (CARE). Five different job-related groups were considered greatly exposed to the disease: rural workers, abattoir workers, veterinarians and veterinary assistants, laboratory workers and hunters. The main risk factors and exposure sources involved in the occupational infection observed from the analysis of the articles were direct contact with animal fluids, failure to comply with the use of personal protective equipment, accidental exposure to live attenuated anti-brucellosis vaccines and non-compliance with biosafety standards. Brucella species frequently isolated from job-related infection were Brucella melitensis, Brucella abortus, Brucella suis and Brucella canis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed using the case-control studies and demonstrated that animal breeders, laboratory workers and abattoir workers have 3.47 [95% confidence interval (CI); 1.47-8.19] times more chance to become infected with Brucella spp. than others individuals that have no contact with the possible sources of infection. This systematic review improved the understanding of the epidemiology of brucellosis as an occupational disease. Rural workers, abattoir workers, veterinarians, laboratory workers and hunters were the groups more exposed to occupational Brucella spp. infection. Moreover, it was observed that the lack of knowledge about brucellosis among frequently exposed professionals, in addition to some behaviors, such as negligence in the use of individual and collective protective measures, increases the probability of infection.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsBrucellaBrucellosisHumansLaboratory PersonnelOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureVeterinarians

Identifiers

PMID32392223
PMCPMC7252629
OpenAlexW3023843036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.