SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020
Occupational exposure to Brucella spp.: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence of Brucella melitensis in Sheep and Goat.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of human brucellosis in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond Serology: A Meta-Analysis of Advancements in Molecular Detection of Brucella spp. in Seronegative Animals and Biological Samples.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Pooled it
- Scoping review of brucellosis in Armenia: persistent neglect, significant knowledge gaps, and a necessity for innovative research, surveillance, and control.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Pooled it
- What risk do Brucella vaccines pose to humans? A systematic review of the scientific literature on occupational exposure.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Occupational Zoonotic Risk at India's Human-Animal Interface: Statutory Origins and a Regulatory Pathway for the Compensation-Prevention Disconnect.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- An ultrasensitive double-antigen sandwich time-resolved fluorescent immunochromatographic assay for quantification of Brucella antibodies.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Brucellosis Surveillance - United States, 2010-2024.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of human and animal brucellosis in Kenya: A One Health meta-regression and network analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Information Pathways Related to Brucellosis Among Adults in Najran City, Saudi Arabia: A Stratified Time-Location Cross-Sectional Study.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Seroincidence of Brucella spp. infection among humans and livestock in a pastoralist setting in Northern Kenya.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The impact of previous brucellosis treatment on the clinical course of neurobrucellosis: a multicentre retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Comparison of serological tools for reliable diagnosis of brucellosis circulation in the West-African context.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Brucellosis in healthcare settings: research advances in nosocomial infection prevention and control.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Afebrile brucellosis patients in endemic areas: a great diagnostic challenge.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Brucellar spondylitis occurring in the cervical vertebra: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Ecological study of human brucellosis in Iran from 2000 to 2023 and the limited role of climatic factors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Human Brucellosis in a Farming and Animal Health Community in South Africa, 2015-2016.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Preventive Immunology for Livestock and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases in the One Health Era: From Mechanistic Insights to Innovative Interventions.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease of remarkable importance worldwide. The focus of this systematic review was to investigate occupational brucellosis and to identify the main infection risks for each group exposed to the pathogen. Seven databases were used to identify papers related to occupational brucellosis: CABI, Cochrane, Pubmed, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. The search resulted in 6123 studies, of which 63 were selected using the quality assessment tools guided from National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Case Report Guidelines (CARE). Five different job-related groups were considered greatly exposed to the disease: rural workers, abattoir workers, veterinarians and veterinary assistants, laboratory workers and hunters. The main risk factors and exposure sources involved in the occupational infection observed from the analysis of the articles were direct contact with animal fluids, failure to comply with the use of personal protective equipment, accidental exposure to live attenuated anti-brucellosis vaccines and non-compliance with biosafety standards. Brucella species frequently isolated from job-related infection were Brucella melitensis, Brucella abortus, Brucella suis and Brucella canis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed using the case-control studies and demonstrated that animal breeders, laboratory workers and abattoir workers have 3.47 [95% confidence interval (CI); 1.47-8.19] times more chance to become infected with Brucella spp. than others individuals that have no contact with the possible sources of infection. This systematic review improved the understanding of the epidemiology of brucellosis as an occupational disease. Rural workers, abattoir workers, veterinarians, laboratory workers and hunters were the groups more exposed to occupational Brucella spp. infection. Moreover, it was observed that the lack of knowledge about brucellosis among frequently exposed professionals, in addition to some behaviors, such as negligence in the use of individual and collective protective measures, increases the probability of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.