ArticleJMIR mental health2020
Developing a Suicide Prevention Social Media Campaign With Young People (The #Chatsafe Project): Co-Design Approach.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Global Prevalence of Non-suicidal Self-injury, Suicide Behaviors, and Associated Risk Factors Among Runaway and Homeless Youth: A Meta-analysis.Community mental health journal · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating the role and effectiveness of co-produced community-based mental health interventions that aim to reduce suicide among adults: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Research Review: The effect of school-based suicide prevention on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts and the role of intervention and contextual factors among adolescents: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022Pooled it
- A mixed-methods systematic review of suicide prevention interventions involving multisectoral collaborations.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- Development of the Pharm-SAVES educational module for gatekeeper suicide prevention training for community pharmacy staff.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Trial
- Rangatahi Youth-Led Dissemination Campaign for Cocreated Eating and Well-Being Guidelines: Process and Pilot Implementation Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- A Pre-Post Study of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of a Co-Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Suicide Prevention App for International Students.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Co-designing suicide prevention research with mothers of suicidal adolescents - applying McKercher's Model of Care.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- A Social Media Single Session Intervention Designed to Promote Healthier Social Media Use: Youth Focus Group Feedback.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Partnering With Teens With Past Suicide-Related Crises: Development, Application and Refinement of Safety Procedures for Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- An adaptive, youth-centred co-design methodology: place-based co-design centring youth and community participation.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- How do Australian social media users experience self-harm and suicide-related content? A National cross-sectional survey comparing young people and adults.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The status of suicide literacy and suicide stigma: their association with demographic factors among Iranian general population.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Mind over waves: uncovering mental health toolkit gaps for young Australian surf lifesavers through an environmental scan and expert survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.Internet interventions · 2025Review
- Review
- Advancing youth co-design of ethical guidelines for AI-powered digital mental health tools.Nature. Mental health · 2025Article
- A youth-informed approach to mental health service websites: 'so people can actually connect'.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Factors that affect clinical youth engagement in digital mental health research: a qualitative sub-study nested within a prospective cohort study.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Observational
- The Community's Role in Rural Youth Suicide Prevention: Perspectives From the Field.The Australian journal of rural health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYoung people commonly use social media platforms to communicate about suicide. Although research indicates that this communication may be helpful, the potential for harm still exists. To facilitate safe communication about suicide on social media, we developed the #chatsafe guidelines, which we sought to implement via a national social media campaign in Australia. Population-wide suicide prevention campaigns have been shown to improve knowledge, awareness, and attitudes toward suicide. However, suicide prevention campaigns will be ineffective if they do not reach and resonate with their target audience. Co-designing suicide prevention campaigns with young people can increase the engagement and usefulness of these youth interventions.
objectiveThis study aimed to document key elements of the co-design process; to evaluate young people's experiences of the co-design process; and to capture young people's recommendations for the #chatsafe suicide prevention social media campaign.
methodsIn total, 11 co-design workshops were conducted, with a total of 134 young people aged between 17 and 25 years. The workshops employed commonly used co-design strategies; however, modifications were made to create a safe and comfortable environment, given the population and complexity and sensitivity of the subject matter. Young people's experiences of the workshops were evaluated through a short survey at the end of each workshop. Recommendations for the campaign strategy were captured through a thematic analysis of the postworkshop discussions with facilitators.
resultsThe majority of young people reported that the workshops were both safe (116/131, 88.5%) and enjoyable (126/131, 96.2%). They reported feeling better equipped to communicate safely about suicide on the web and feeling better able to identify and support others who may be at risk of suicide. Key recommendations for the campaign strategy were that young people wanted to see bite-sized sections of the guidelines come to life via shareable content such as short videos, animations, photographs, and images. They wanted to feel visible in campaign materials and wanted all materials to be fully inclusive and linked to resources and support services.
conclusionsThis is the first study internationally to co-design a suicide prevention social media campaign in partnership with young people. The study demonstrates that it is feasible to safely engage young people in co-designing a suicide prevention intervention and that this process produces recommendations, which can usefully inform suicide prevention campaigns aimed at youth. The fact that young people felt better able to safely communicate about suicide on the web as a result of participation in the study augurs well for youth engagement with the national campaign, which was rolled out across Australia. If effective, the campaign has the potential to better prepare many young people to communicate safely about suicide on the web.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.