Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32391669›Full record

Observational studyZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences2020

[Clinical observation of 6 severe COVID-19 patients treated with plasma exchange or tocilizumab].

Song Luo, Lijuan Yang, Chun Wang, Chuanmiao Liu, Dianming Li

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of therapeutic plasma exchange in COVID-19: A systematic review of current evidence.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Plasma exchange and COVID 19.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2022
    Article
  3. Treatment of MIS-C in Children and Adolescents.Current pediatrics reports · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Potential of therapeutic plasmapheresis in treatment of COVID-19 patients: Immunopathogenesis and coagulopathy.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020
    Review
  8. The successful management of an elderly Covid-19 infected patient by plasmapheresis.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Song LuoDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, Anhui Province, China.
Lijuan YangDepartment of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, Anhui Province, China.
Chun WangDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, Anhui Province, China.
Chuanmiao LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, Anhui Province, China.
Dianming LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, Anhui Province, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo observe the clinical effect of plasma exchange and tocilizumab in treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

methodsSix patients with severe COVID-19 admitted in First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 25 to February 25, 2020. Three patients were treated with plasma exchange and three patients were treated with tocilizumab. The effect on excessive inflammatory reaction of plasma exchange and tocilizumab was observed.

resultsThe C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 levels were significantly decreased and the lymphocyte and prothrombin time were improved in 3 patients after treatment with plasma exchange; while inflammation level was not significantly decreased, and lymphocyte and prothrombin time did not improve in 3 patients treated with tocilizumab.

conclusionsFor severe COVID-19 patients with strong inflammatory reaction, plasma exchange may be preferred.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPlasma ExchangePneumonia, ViralBetacoronavirusCOVID-19Cytokine Release SyndromeHumansProthrombin TimeSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID32391669
PMCPMC8800770
OpenAlexW3013411657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.