Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32391442›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2020

The use of smartphone apps in clinical practice: A survey of South African physiotherapists.

Michael Rowe, Berenice Sauls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael RoweDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1538-6052
Berenice SaulsDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3449-2704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is anecdotal evidence that physiotherapy clinicians increasingly are using medical apps and health-related apps as part of their clinical practice, and in some cases, even 'prescribing apps' to patients. However, there is limited information on how South African physiotherapists use, and what they think about, the integration of mobile apps in their practice.

objectivesThis study aimed to describe the use of smartphone apps as part of clinical practice in a small group of South African physiotherapists.

methodThis study made use of a cross-sectional, descriptive design and a self-administered questionnaire to survey practitioners. The population included all 1300 physiotherapists who were registered with the Orthopaedic Manipulative Physiotherapists Group (OMPTG) of the special interest group of the South African Society of Physiotherapists (SASP), with a sample of 270 out of 1300 who responded (response rate = 21%). Descriptive data are presented using graphs, figures and percentages, and responses to open-ended questions are included in support of the themes.

resultsThe majority of the participants used apps as part of their practice (60%) but did not prescribe apps to patients. Most apps are used for administrative and communication purposes. Even clinicians who used apps themselves expressed concerns about prescribing them to patients, and there were clear misconceptions about the use of apps.

conclusionMany clinicians in this study reported that there were real benefits to the use of smartphone apps as part of their practice. However, they raised concerns about the more general prescription of apps for clients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Further research, education and collaboration amongst all stakeholders is necessary to produce guidelines for the use of apps in clinical practice.

Indexed as

clinical practicehealth-related appsmedical appsmobile appssmartphone apps

Identifiers

PMID32391442
PMCPMC7203535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.