Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32391198›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Performance in a novel environment subject to ghost competition.

Karen Bisschop, Frederik Mortier, Dries Bonte, Rampal S Etienne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen BisschopGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-2636
Frederik MortierDepartment of Biology, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
Dries BonteDepartment of Biology, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
Rampal S EtienneGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2142-7612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA central tenet of the evolutionary theory of communities is that competition impacts evolutionary processes such as local adaptation. Species in a community exert a selection pressure on other species and may drive them to extinction. We know, however, very little about the influence of unsuccessful or ghost species on the evolutionary dynamics within the community.

methodsHere we report the long-term influence of a ghost competitor on the performance of a more successful species using experimental evolution. We transferred the spider mite

resultsThe competitor species, DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that early experienced selection pressures can exert a persistent evolutionary signal on species' performance in novel environments.

Indexed as

Experimental evolutionInterspecific competitionIntraspecific competitionLocal adaptationSpider mitesTetranychus urticae

Identifiers

PMID32391198
PMCPMC7195835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.