Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32391170›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2020

Ensuring young voices are heard in core outcome set development: international workshops with 70 children and young people.

Frances C Sherratt, Heather Bagley, Simon R Stones, Jenny Preston, Nigel J Hall, Sarah L Gorst, Bridget Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frances C Sherratt1Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Room 223, Second Floor, Block B, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Dover Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK.
Heather Bagley2Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon R Stones3School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jenny Preston4NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Nigel J Hall5University Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sarah L Gorst2Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Bridget Young1Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Room 223, Second Floor, Block B, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Dover Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-9901

Funding

Department of Health 14/192/90
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryResearchers test treatments to ensure these work and are safe. They do this by studying the effects that treatments have on patients by measuring outcomes, such as pain and quality of life. Often research teams measure different outcomes even though each team is studying the same condition. This makes it hard to compare the findings from different studies and it can reduce the accuracy of the treatment advice available to patients. Increasingly, researchers are tackling this problem by developing 'core outcome sets'. These are lists of outcomes that all researchers working on a given condition should measure in their studies. It is important that patients have a voice in the development of core outcome sets and children and young people are no exception. But their voices have rarely been heard when core outcome sets are developed. Researchers are trying to address this problem and make sure that core outcome sets are developed in ways that are suitable for children and young people. As a first step, we held two international workshops with children and young people to listen to their views. They emphasised the importance of motivating young people to participate in developing core outcome sets, making them feel valued, and making the development process more interactive, enjoyable and convenient. We hope this commentary will encourage researchers to include children and young people when developing core outcome sets and to adapt their methods so these are suitable for young participants. Future research is important to examine whether these adaptations are effective. ABSTRACT:

Indexed as

ChildrenCore outcome setOutcomesPatient and public involvementYoung people

Identifiers

PMID32391170
PMCPMC7201753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.