ArticleOncology letters2020
Advantages of gross total resection in patients with astrocytoma: A population-based study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-driven national analysis for predicting adverse outcomes in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the association between surgical methods and survival outcomes in patients with astrocytoma. Patients diagnosed with astrocytoma between January 2004 and December 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze the effects of surgical methods on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Among 42,224 eligible patients with astrocytoma, 11,427 (27.1%) patients did not receive surgery, 7,661 (18.1%) received excisional biopsy (EB), 5,520 (13.1%) received a subtotal resection (STR), 6,037 (14.3%) received a gross resection (GR), 5,314 (12.6%) received a partial resection (PR) and 6,265 (14.8%) received a gross total resection (GTR). Patients who underwent GR had the longest survival time (17.00 months). However, over time, the proportion of patients who underwent STR or GR increased, whereas the proportion of patients who did not undergo surgery, PR or GTR decreased. Furthermore, surgical method was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS for the patients with astrocytoma. Multivariate Cox regression showed that GTR was associated with the more favorable OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-0.83; P<0.001] and CSS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.83; P<0.001) times compared with EB. Moreover, similar results were observed in subgroup analyses based on summary stage and grade. In the present study, it was demonstrated that GTR was one of the effective surgical methods for improved OS and CSS time in patients with astrocytoma. However, among the American astrocytoma population, the proportion of patients who underwent GTR decreased. It is necessary to further advocate for the efficacy of GTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.