Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32391069›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

High-throughput method for detection and quantification of lesions on leaf scale based on trypan blue staining and digital image analysis.

Emina Mulaosmanovic, Tobias U T Lindblom, Marie Bengtsson, Sofia T Windstam, Lars Mogren, Salla Marttila, Hartmut Stützel, Beatrix W Alsanius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fluorescence Detection of Pyrene-StainedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emina Mulaosmanovic *1Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 103, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3169-8336
Tobias U T Lindblom *2Department of Crop Production Ecology, Plant Ecology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7043, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Marie Bengtsson3Department of Plant Protection Biology, Chemical Ecology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 102, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden.
Sofia T Windstam4Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Oswego, 7060 NY-104, Oswego, NY 13126 USA.
Lars Mogren1Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 103, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden.
Salla Marttila5Department of Plant Protection Biology, Resistance Biology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 102, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden.
Hartmut Stützel6Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany.
Beatrix W Alsanius1Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 103, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundField-grown leafy vegetables can be damaged by biotic and abiotic factors, or mechanically damaged by farming practices. Available methods to evaluate leaf tissue damage mainly rely on colour differentiation between healthy and damaged tissues. Alternatively, sophisticated equipment such as microscopy and hyperspectral cameras can be employed. Depending on the causal factor, colour change in the wounded area is not always induced and, by the time symptoms become visible, a plant can already be severely affected. To accurately detect and quantify damage on leaf scale, including microlesions, reliable differentiation between healthy and damaged tissue is essential. We stained whole leaves with trypan blue dye, which traverses compromised cell membranes but is not absorbed in viable cells, followed by automated quantification of damage on leaf scale.

resultsWe present a robust, fast and sensitive method for leaf-scale visualisation, accurate automated extraction and measurement of damaged area on leaves of leafy vegetables. The image analysis pipeline we developed automatically identifies leaf area and individual stained (lesion) areas down to cell level. As proof of principle, we tested the methodology for damage detection and quantification on two field-grown leafy vegetable species, spinach and Swiss chard.

conclusionsOur novel lesion quantification method can be used for detection of large (macro) or single-cell (micro) lesions on leaf scale, enabling quantification of lesions at any stage and without requiring symptoms to be in the visible spectrum. Quantifying the wounded area on leaf scale is necessary for generating prediction models for economic losses and produce shelf-life. In addition, risk assessments are based on accurate prediction of the relationship between leaf damage and infection rates by opportunistic pathogens and our method helps determine the severity of leaf damage at fine resolution.

Indexed as

DamageImage analysisLeaf scaleLeafy vegetablesLesionsSpinachWounds

Identifiers

PMID32391069
PMCPMC7197134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.