SynthesisJournal of sports science & medicine2020
The Effects of Assisted and Resisted Plyometric Training Programs on Vertical Jump Performance in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Physical Training Programs on Healthy Athletes' Vertical Jump Height: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of plyometric training on athletic' jump performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Pooled it
- Dose-response relationships of sand training compared to other surface training in improving change of direction and jump performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of diverse resistance training modalities on performance measures in athletes: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of functional training on physical fitness and skill-related performance among basketball players: a systematic review.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of Plyometric Training on Physical Performance: An Umbrella Review.Sports medicine - open · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of plyometric training with speed and weight overloads on volleyball players' strength, power, and jumping performance.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Effects of resisted movement training on change-of-direction speed in recreationally active and trained individuals: A systematic review with network meta-analysis and meta-regression.Journal of sport and health science · 2026Review
- Comparing the Force-Time Characteristics Between Countermovement and Assisted Countermovement Jump with Different Landing Strategies.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Kettlebell Training vs. Plyometric Training: A Comparison of Jump Performance in Volleyball and Basketball Athletes.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- The effects of an 8-week French Contrast Training program on lower limb strength and power in elite martial arts athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Configurational paths to promoting children's agility and balance quality: based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Impaired Symmetry in Single-Leg Vertical Jump and Drop Jump Performance 7 Months After ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Physiological Responses and Performance during an Integrated High-Intensity Interval Aerobic and Power Training Protocol.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The validity and reliability of a hydraulic resistance device for assessing resisted sprint time.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Plyometric Training Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Their Choices and Insights.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Review
- Strength and Conditioning Practices of Brazilian Olympic Sprint and Jump Coaches.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Article
- Training Specificity for Athletes: Emphasis on Strength-Power Training: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2022Review
- Offseason Workout Recommendations for Baseball Players.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional, assisted and resisted plyometrics are considered to be effective training methods for improving vertical jump performance. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare effectiveness of traditional, assisted and resisted plyometric methods on vertical jumping ability in adults. Available literature was searched using MEDLINE (via EBSCO), SPORTDiscus (via EBSCO), Scopus and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Peer-reviewed studies were accepted only if they met all eligibility criteria: (a) healthy adults mean age > 18 years (b) training program based on plyometric exercises (c) the study reported on vertical jump height for the countermovement jump or drop jump performance. Of the 5092 articles identified, 17 studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses. Both funnel plot analysis and Egger's test (p = 0.04) indicated publication bias for the comparison of resisted plyometrics and control condition. No publication bias was found for the other meta-analyses (p > 0.05). The effects of the traditional and assisted plyometric methods, when compared with the control condition (a non-plyometric condition), on jump height were moderate (SMD = 0.68, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.99, p < 0.0001; SMD = 0.70, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.20, p = 0.006, respectively). The effects of the resisted plyometric methods, when compared with the control condition, on a jump height was small (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.79, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences between the training effects of the assisted and traditional plyometric interventions on jump height (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI -1.66 to 2.91, p = 0.59), nor between the resisted and traditional plyometric training programs (SMD = 0.2, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.23, p = 0.86). Traditional, assisted and resisted plyometric methods are effective training modalities for augmenting vertical jump performance in healthy adults. Resisted and assisted plyometric methods are equally effective as the traditional plyometric method in improving vertical jumping ability in healthy adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32390728PMC7196747W3011654821What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.