Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390721›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sports science & medicine2020

Acute Maltodextrin Supplementation During Resistance Exercise.

Dylan T Wilburn, Steven B Machek, Thomas D Cardaci, Paul S Hwang, Darryn S Willoughby

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dylan T WilburnExercise and Biochemical Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Baylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Steven B MachekExercise and Biochemical Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Baylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Thomas D CardaciExercise and Biochemical Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Baylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Paul S HwangExercise and Biochemical Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Baylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Darryn S WilloughbyExercise and Biochemical Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Baylor University, Waco, TX USA.
Baylor University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the research investigating the ergogenic enhancing mechanisms of carbohydrate have been conducted using aerobic based exercise. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of pre-exercise maltodextrin ingestion on resistance exercise performance, serum insulin, epinephrine, glucose, and muscle glycogen concentrations. In a double blind, cross over, repeated measures design, participants completed four sets to failure at 70% of 1-RM with 45s rest on the angled leg press with or without pre-exercise maltodextrin (2g/kg) after a 3hr fast. Serum glucose, epinephrine, and insulin were assessed at baseline, 30 min post-ingestion, immediately after, and 1hr post-exercise with or without carbohydrate supplementation. Muscle glycogen was assessed from biopsy specimens sampled from the vastus lateralis before supplementation, immediately after exercise, and 1hr post exercise under both conditions. There was no main effect of supplement on resistance exercise performance (p = 0.18). Muscle glycogen concentration decreased across time for both groups (p < 0.001). There was an interaction in serum glucose decreasing more during exercise in the carbohydrate condition (p = 0.026). An interaction occurred showing insulin decreased during exercise in the carbohydrate condition (p = 0.003). Also, there was a main effect of insulin being elevated with carbohydrate consumption (p = 0.027). Epinephrine was decreased across all time points after carbohydrate ingestion (p = 0.023). Carbohydrate supplementation before resistance exercise did not improve leg press performance to fatigue despite increased metabolic substrate availability. These results indicate that pre-exercise dietary carbohydrate will be utilized preferentially during exercise due to decreased epinephrine, decreased serum glucose, and increased insulin concentrations. However, the increases in glycolytic substrate availability will not increase exercise performance or glycogen content following 1hr of recovery.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsResistance TrainingBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodEpinephrineExerciseGlycogenHumansInsulinMaleMaltoseMuscle, SkeletalPolysaccharidesYoung AdultBlood GlucoseEpinephrineGlycogenInsulinmaltodextrinMaltosePolysaccharidesanaerobic exerciseglycogenhormonesSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID32390721
PMCPMC7196753
OpenAlexW3006528517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.