Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390697›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option?

Edoardo Troncone, Alessandro Fugazza, Annalisa Cappello, Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco, Giovanni Monteleone, Alessandro Repici, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh, Andrea Anderloni

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05561907 (Enteral Anastomosis for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05561907 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Enteral Anastomosis for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2022 to 2027Enrolled32ConditionsGastric Outlet ObstructionArmsSurgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ), Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (EGJ)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edoardo TronconeDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy.
Alessandro FugazzaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy.
Annalisa CappelloDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy.
Giovanna Del Vecchio BlancoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy.
Giovanni MonteleoneDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Napoli 80129, Italy.
Alessandro RepiciDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy.
Anthony Yuen Bun TeohDepartment of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Andrea AnderloniDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Mi), Italy. andrea.anderloni@humanitas.it.
Prince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a clinical condition characterized by the mechanical obstruction of the pylorus or the duodenum due to tumor compression/infiltration, with consequent reduction or impossibility of an adequate oral intake. MGOO is mainly secondary to advanced pancreatic or gastric cancers, and significantly impacts on patients' survival and quality of life. Patients suffering from this condition often present with intractable vomiting and severe malnutrition, which further compromise therapeutic chances. Currently, palliative strategies are based primarily on surgical gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic enteral stenting with self-expanding metal stents. Several studies have shown that surgical approach has the advantage of a more durable relief of symptoms and the need of fewer re-interventions, at the cost of higher procedure-related risks and longer hospital stay. On the other hand, enteral stenting provides rapid clinical improvement, but have the limit of higher stent dysfunction rate due to tumor ingrowth and a subsequent need of frequent re-interventions. Recently, a third way has come from interventional endoscopic ultrasound, through the development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy technique with lumen-apposing metal stent. This new technique may ideally encompass the minimal invasiveness of an endoscopic procedure and the long-lasting effect of the surgical gastrojejunostomy, and brought encouraging results so far, even if prospective comparative trial are still lacking. In this Review, we described technical aspects and clinical outcomes of the above-cited therapeutic approaches, and discussed the open questions about the current management of MGOO.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEndosonographyGastric Outlet ObstructionGastroenterostomyHumansJejunumLength of StayNeoplasm StagingPalliative CarePancreatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeReoperationSelf Expandable Metallic StentsStomachStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDuodenal strictureEndoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomyEnteral stentGastric cancerGastrojejunostomyInterventional endoscopic ultrasonographyPancreatic cancerSelf-expanding metal stent

Identifiers

PMID32390697
PMCPMC7201143
OpenAlexW3023631618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.