Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390689›Full record

ArticleSystem dynamics review

SD Meets OR: A New Synergy to Address Policy Problems.

Navid Ghaffarzadegan, Richard C Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in System dynamics review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Navid GhaffarzadeganVirginia Tech, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering.
Richard C LarsonMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.

Funding

Developing a Scientific Workforce Analysis and Modeling FrameworkU01GM094141 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAWLEY, JOSHUA · 2010 to 2018
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM094141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reflect on our past seven years of collaboration to develop systems models of U.S. higher education and scientific workforce development. Based on three recent modeling examples, we offer a methodological proposition that many traditional Operations Research (OR) models can be improved by including feedback processes as is commonly done in system dynamics (SD) modeling. Such models, even if simple and approximate, can be powerful, insightful, easy to communicate, and effective. While these modeling examples may not follow conventional SD or OR modeling, they benefit from and contribute to both schools of modeling. We argue that to build such synergy, modeling teams should be willing to create models building on the strengths of each school of modeling.

Indexed as

feedback loopoperations researchpolicy modelingqueueing theoryscience policysystem dynamics

Identifiers

PMID32390689
PMCPMC7207037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.