Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390605›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2020

Prognostic significance of elevated pretreatment serum levels of CEA and CA-125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Yu-Han Lin, Chen-Hsuan Wu, Hung-Chun Fu, Yu-Jen Chen, Yin-Yi Chen, Yu-Che Ou, Hao Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Han LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chen-Hsuan WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hung-Chun FuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Jen ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Yin-Yi ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Che OuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chia-Yi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
Hao LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWChiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer is a highly lethal gynecological malignancy. Accurate and cost-effective predictive tools to estimate the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer before treatment are currently lacking.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125) in primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

methodsBetween 2008 and 2016, 326 patients with a diagnosis of primary epithelial ovarian cancer were retrospectively reviewed. We attempted to identify an optimal cut-off value of CEA to predict survival using ROC curve analysis. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate prognostic factors.

resultsThe optimal cut-off value of CEA was 2.6 ng/mL. In univariate and multivariate analyses, FIGO stage and pretreatment CA-125 and CEA levels significantly predicted progression-free and overall survival. The 5-year progression-free survival rate for patients with both a CEA level < 2.6 ng/mL and CA-125 level < 35 U/mL was 84%, compared to only 33% for the patients with higher levels of both markers (p< 0.001). The 5-year cancer specific survival rate was 94% in those with a CEA level < 2.6 ng/mL and CA-125 level < 35 U/mL, and only 39% for those with higher levels of both markers (p< 0.001).

conclusionsIn addition to traditional prognostic factors, a pretreatment serum CEA level ⩾ 2.6 ng/mL and CA-125 level ⩾ 35 U/mL were also independent prognostic factors for epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients with an elevated CEA and/or CA-125 level before treatment should be considered to be at high-risk of recurrence and death.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humancarbohydrate antigen 125carcinoembryonic antigenEpithelial ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID32390605
PMCPMC12662360
OpenAlexW3023343849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.