Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390494›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponins: The Evidence Behind Sex-Specific Cutoffs.

Prerana M Bhatia, Lori B Daniels

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Predictive Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin I for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. High-Sensitivity Troponin: Finding a Meaningful Delta.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex Differences in Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Injury After Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prerana M BhatiaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine University of California San Diego.
Lori B DanielsDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine University of California San Diego.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergence of various highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays into clinical practice provides a new tool for clinicians diagnosing acute coronary syndrome. These assays also create a challenge for laboratories and clinicians who have yet to familiarize themselves with sex-specific cutoffs. Healthy men and women, studied across various age groups and geographic locations, have notable differences in baseline values of highly sensitive cardiac troponin I and T, leading to establishment of sex-specific upper reference limits and cutoffs. Several differences in cardiac physiology, size, and structure may account for baseline differences in highly sensitive cardiac troponins and outcomes between the sexes. The clinical utility of implementing sex-specific cutoffs for diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome remains unclear. Presently, the only prospective study failed to show improved outcomes for men or women with use of sex-specific cutoffs; however, a major limitation is the frequent lack of diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive interventions prescribed to women with low-level troponin elevations. Based on the current literature, we posit that there may nonetheless be clinical value in the use of sex-specific cutoffs for evaluating suspected acute coronary syndrome, especially in select patient populations such as younger women who tend to have lower baseline values of highly sensitive cardiac troponins. Future studies should prospectively evaluate differences in diagnostic, pharmacologic, and interventional management in men and women using myocardial infarctions classified with sex-specific cutoffs of the highly sensitive cardiac troponin assays.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsTroponinBiomarkersTroponincardiac biomarkerscardiac troponinshighly sensitive cardiac troponinssex‐specific cutoffs

Identifiers

PMID32390494
PMCPMC7660872
OpenAlexW3022449534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.