Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390414›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2020

Retip: Retention Time Prediction for Compound Annotation in Untargeted Metabolomics.

Paolo Bonini, Tobias Kind, Hiroshi Tsugawa, Dinesh Kumar Barupal, Oliver Fiehn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. FastRet: Fast and Simple Retention Time Prediction in Liquid Chromatography.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Scanning central carbon metabolism: a HILIC-HR-TOF-MS metabolome method.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. LC-MS/MS-Based Untargeted Hydrophilic Metabolomics Using MS-DIAL.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo BoniniNGAlab, La Riera de Gaia, Tarragona 43762, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5379-2265
Tobias KindWest Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Hiroshi TsugawaRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2015-3958
Dinesh Kumar BarupalWest Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Oliver FiehnWest Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, California 95616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-8928
University of California, Davis · USRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JP

Funding

West Coast Metabolomics Center for Compound IdentificationU2CES030158 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIEHN, OLIVER · 2018 to 2021
$4.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unidentified peaks remain a major problem in untargeted metabolomics by LC-MS/MS. Confidence in peak annotations increases by combining MS/MS matching and retention time. We here show how retention times can be predicted from molecular structures. Two large, publicly available data sets were used for model training in machine learning: the Fiehn hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography data set (HILIC) of 981 primary metabolites and biogenic amines,and the RIKEN plant specialized metabolome annotation (PlaSMA) database of 852 secondary metabolites that uses reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC). Five different machine learning algorithms have been integrated into the Retip R package: the random forest, Bayesian-regularized neural network, XGBoost, light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), and Keras algorithms for building the retention time prediction models. A complete workflow for retention time prediction was developed in R. It can be freely downloaded from the GitHub repository (https://www.retip.app). Keras outperformed other machine learning algorithms in the test set with minimum overfitting, verified by small error differences between training, test, and validation sets. Keras yielded a mean absolute error of 0.78 min for HILIC and 0.57 min for RPLC. Retip is integrated into the mass spectrometry software tools MS-DIAL and MS-FINDER, allowing a complete compound annotation workflow. In a test application on mouse blood plasma samples, we found a 68% reduction in the number of candidate structures when searching all isomers in MS-FINDER compound identification software. Retention time prediction increases the identification rate in liquid chromatography and subsequently leads to an improved biological interpretation of metabolomics data.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMetabolomicsChromatography, LiquidHumansOrganic ChemicalsTandem Mass SpectrometryTime FactorsOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID32390414
PMCPMC8715951
OpenAlexW3021129126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.