Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390351›Full record

ArticleBrain tumor research and treatment2020

Re-Irradiation and Its Contribution to Good Prognosis in Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients.

Mi Sun Kim, Jaejoon Lim, Hyun Soo Shin, Kyung Gi Cho

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain tumor research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Salvage reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective case series analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mi Sun Kim *Department of Radiation Oncology, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-5579
Jaejoon Lim *Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8299-8078
Hyun Soo ShinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Kyung Gi ChoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea. sandori50@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-2719
CHA University Bundang Medical Center · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1C1B5086460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation therapy, one of the strongest anti-cancer treatments, is already performed to treat primary glioblastoma; however, the effect of repeated radiation therapy for recurrent tumors has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of re-irradiation in treating recurrent glioblastoma.

methodsThe study included 36 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with repeated radiation therapy between 2002 and 2016. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) were performed in these patients.

resultsFourteen patients received SRS with a median dose of 25 Gy (range, 20-32 Gy) in 1-5 fractions. Twenty-two patients received HSRT with a median dose of 40 Gy (range, 31.5-52 Gy) in 6-20 fractions. There were six treatment-related grade 3 adverse events. Survival analysis showed that re-irradiation significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The median OS and one-year OS rate after re-irradiation were 17.2 months and 60.4%, respectively. The median PFS and 6-month PFS rate after re-irradiation were 4.4 months and 41.9%, respectively. Of the 36 patients, three survived without any progression in their condition.

conclusionRe-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma showed favorable outcomes. Radiation dose and fractionation should be carefully considered to minimize radiation necrosis.

Indexed as

Recurrent glioblastomaRe-irradiationStereotactic radiosurgeryToxicity

Identifiers

PMID32390351
PMCPMC7221471
OpenAlexW3023028081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.