Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390250›Full record

SynthesisOral diseases2021

Using next-generation sequencing to detect oral microbiome change following periodontal interventions: A systematic review.

Ya Zhang, Yinliang Qi, Edward C M Lo, Colman McGrath, May Lei Mei, Ruoxi Dai

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oral diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ya ZhangThe Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yinliang QiThe Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Edward C M LoDepartment of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Colman McGrathDepartment of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
May Lei MeiThe Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Ruoxi DaiThe Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-3269

Funding

Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation 1808085QH247National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis systematic review was to evaluate the change of oral microbiome based on next-generation sequencing (NGS)-metagenomic analysis following periodontal interventions among systematically healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND

methodsA structured search strategy consisting of "metagenomics" and "oral diseases" was applied to PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify effective papers. The included studies were original studies published in English, using metagenomic approach to analyze the effectiveness of periodontal intervention on oral microbiome among systematically healthy human subjects with periodontitis.

resultsA total of 12 papers were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of selected study, quantitative analysis was not performed. The findings as to how alpha diversity changed after interventions were not consistent across studies. Six studies illustrated clear separation of microbial composition between dental plaque samples collected before and after intervention using principal coordinates/component analysis. The most commonly detected genera before intervention were Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella, and Prevotella, while Streptococcus and Actinomyces usually increased and became the dominant genera after intervention. Correlation network analysis revealed that after intervention, the topology of network was different compared to the corresponding pre-interventional samples.

conclusionExisting evidence of metagenomic studies depicts a complex change in oral microbiome after periodontal intervention.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPeriodontitisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsmetagenomicnext-generation sequencingperiodontitissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32390250
PMCPMC8247266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.