Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390238›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Cervical Cancer in Young Women: Do They Have a Worse Prognosis? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis in a Population of Mexico.

David Isla-Ortiz, Elizabeth Palomares-Castillo, José Emilio Mille-Loera, Nora Ramírez-Calderón, Alejandro Mohar-Betancourt, Abelardo A Meneses-García, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Changes in the diversity of local cervical bacteria in women with cervical cancer receiving antineoplastic treatment.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David Isla-OrtizNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elizabeth Palomares-CastilloNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
José Emilio Mille-LoeraNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Nora Ramírez-CalderónNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro Mohar-BetancourtNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Abelardo A Meneses-GarcíaNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Nancy Reynoso-NoverónNational Cancer Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is a global problem; it is among the five leading causes of cancer death in women. Several studies have examined the association between age and disease prognosis; however, controversy still exists. The objective of the present study is to determine if age at diagnosis has an impact on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective cohort of 2,982 patients with CC treated at the National Cancer Institute of Mexico from 2005 to 2015. We collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data, as well as current status, of 2 groups: women under and over 40 years of age. We calculated OS and DFS rates with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine risks.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 26.5 months (percentile [P]

conclusionWe corroborated that age at diagnosis is not a prognostic factor for decreased or increased OS or DFS, and in both groups, the stage, histologic subtype, hydronephrosis, and node involvement were identified as factors adverse to OS and DFS, and pregnancy history was a protective factor in DFS. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The present study directly affects everyday clinical practice because it allows us to focus on the most relevant prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer. When planning treatment and follow-up, clinicians should focus on stage at diagnosis, histologic subtype, hydronephrosis, and distant metastasis instead of patients' age. They should also be aware of any previous pregnancies and poor response, or nonresponse, to treatment, which results in disease progression and persistence. Paying attention to these factors affecting overall survival and disease-free survival will help treat patients better and increase their chances of survival and improve their quality of life.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMexicoNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesCervical cancerWorst prognosisYoung women

Identifiers

PMID32390238
PMCPMC7485336
OpenAlexW3022733773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.