Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390088›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Potentially inappropriate medications for older adults in a primary healthcare unit in southern Brazil.

Taiane Santos Garcia, Bruno Simas da Rocha, Stela Maris De Jezus Castro, Isabela Heineck

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taiane Santos GarciaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Assistência Farmacêutica, School of Pharmacy, Anexo I da Faculdade de Farmácia, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, R. São Luís, 150 - Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-170, Brazil. taiane.sg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-157X
Bruno Simas da RochaGraduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Clinical Pharmacy Section, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Bairro Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil.
Stela Maris De Jezus CastroDepartment of Statistics, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500 Prédio 43-111, Bairro Agronomia, Porto Alegre, 91509-900, Brazil.
Isabela HeineckPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Assistência Farmacêutica, School of Pharmacy, Anexo I da Faculdade de Farmácia, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, R. São Luís, 150 - Santana, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-170, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Potentially inappropriate medications for older adults are those that offer more risks than benefits for this population. Such medications found in older adults' prescriptions across the world are associated with higher rates of comorbidities and hospitalizations, along with high expenditure on healthcare resources. Objectives To estimate the frequency of older adults using potentially inappropriate medications according to four different criteria, to identify factors associated with the use of such medicines and differences between the tools. Setting A primary healthcare unit linked to a university hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Method This was a cross-sectional study conducted via data collection from the electronic medical records of 390 older adults. The information collected comprised sex, age, chronic diseases diagnosed and medications used. The dependent variable of the study was the use of at least one potentially inappropriate medication, according to the following criteria: Beers, Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP), Brazilian consensus and Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS). Main outcome measurement Prevalence of inappropriate medication, differences between the tools and associated factors. Results: The use of at least one potentially inappropriate medication was found in 55.1% of the sample according to the Beers criterion, 51.3% according to the Brazilian consensus, 42.6% according to STOPP and 23.6% according to ARS. It was also seen that 14.9% of the studied population was exposed to a very strong anticholinergic risk. Depending on which tools were used, the agreement observed between the criteria was considered high, moderate, or low. Regarding the four criteria, the use of potentially inappropriate medication is associated with polypharmacy, the diagnosis of three or more chronic diseases and the presence of neuropsychiatric and musculoskeletal diseases. Conclusion Among the older adult population studied, the prevalence of potentially anappropriate medication is high, according to the four different classification criteria used. As a more specific tool, the agreement between Anticholinergic Risk Scale and other criteria was lower, but it can be an important complement to other lists.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Chronic ConditionsPolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesAnticolinergic risk scaleBeers criteriaBrazilInappropriate prescriptionOlder adultsPIM listPrimary careSTOPP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.