ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2020
A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions.
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Establishing a usability cut-point for the health information technology usability evaluation scale (Health-ITUES).International journal of medical informatics · 2022Trial
- Examining the Information Systems Success (ISS) of a mobile sexual health app (MyPEEPS Mobile) from the perspective of very young men who have sex with men (YMSM).International journal of medical informatics · 2021Trial
- User-centered design of graphical user interfaces for telemedical robotic systems: development and usability study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Evolving roles and impacts of digital health tools in HIV prevention efforts in Africa: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Usability Evaluation of the MyPEEPS Plus Mobile App for PrEP Uptake.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2025Article
- Involving End Users in the Development and Usability Testing of a Smartphone App Designed for Individuals With Prediabetes: Mixed-Methods Focus Group Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Development and usability testing of a multifaceted intervention to reduce low-value injury care.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Evaluating an App-Based Intervention for Preventing Firearm Violence and Substance Use in Young Black Boys and Men: Usability Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Comparison of evaluation methods for improving the usability of a Spanish mHealth tool.International journal of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Patients' perceptions of use, needs, and preferences related to a telemedicine solution for HIV care in a Norwegian outpatient clinic: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Evaluation Methods in Clinical Health Technologies: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
- Usability of a mobile application for health professionals in home care services: a user-centered approach.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Usability Evaluation of the mLab App for Improving Home HIV Testing Behaviors in Youth at Risk of HIV Infection.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2021Article
- The most used questionnaires for evaluating telemedicine services.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Usability study of SOSteniamoci: An internet-based intervention platform to support informal caregivers in Italy.Digital healthArticle
- Usability testing of tablet-based cognitive behavioral intervention application to improve a simple walking activity for older adults with arthritis fatigue.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo provide a comprehensive review of usability testing of eHealth interventions for HIV. RECENT
findingsWe identified 28 articles that assessed the usability of eHealth interventions for HIV, most of which were published within the past 3 years. The majority of the eHealth interventions for HIV was developed on a mobile platform and focused on HIV prevention as the intended health outcome. Usability evaluation methods included eye-tracking, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, contextual interviews, think-aloud protocols, cognitive walkthroughs, heuristic evaluations and expert reviews, focus groups, and scenarios. A wide variety of methods is available to evaluate the usability of eHealth interventions. Employing multiple methods may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the usability of eHealth interventions as compared with inclusion of only a single evaluation method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.