Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32390029›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2020

Surface analysis tools for characterizing biological materials.

Joe E Baio, Daniel J Graham, David G Castner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ToF-SIMS analysis of ultrathin films and their fragmentation patterns.Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developments and Ongoing Challenges for Analysis of Surface-Bound Proteins.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joe E BaioSchool of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Daniel J GrahamNational ESCA and Surface Analysis Center for Biomedical Problems, Box 351653, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. castner@uw.edu and Department of Bioengineering, Box 351653, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-7475
David G CastnerNational ESCA and Surface Analysis Center for Biomedical Problems, Box 351653, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. castner@uw.edu and Department of Bioengineering, Box 351653, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA and Department of Chemical Engineering, Box 351653, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-706X

Funding

Surface Analysis Facility for Biomedical ProblemsP41EB002027 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CASTNER, DAVID G · 2003 to 2019
$17.6M
Microfluidic Photoreactor for Treatment of HyperbilirubinemiaR21HD096301 · NICHD · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAIO, JOE E, HIGGINS, ADAM Z · 2018 to 2019
$372k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002027NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD096301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surfaces represent a unique state of matter that typically have significantly different compositions and structures from the bulk of a material. Since surfaces are the interface between a material and its environment, they play an important role in how a material interacts with its environment. Thus, it is essential to characterize, in as much detail as possible, the surface structure and composition of a material. However, this can be challenging since the surface region typically is only minute portion of the entire material, requiring specialized techniques to selectively probe the surface region. This tutorial will provide a brief review of several techniques used to characterize the surface and interface regions of biological materials. For each technique we provide a description of the key underlying physics and chemistry principles, the information provided, strengths and weaknesses, the types of samples that can be analyzed, and an example application. Given the surface analysis challenges for biological materials, typically there is never just one technique that can provide a complete surface characterization. Thus, a multi-technique approach to biological surface analysis is always required.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDimethylpolysiloxanesHumansHydrocarbonsMass SpectrometryMicroscopy, Scanning ProbeOilsOptical DevicesPhotoelectron SpectroscopySaltsSolventsSurface PropertiesSynchrotronsbaysilonBiocompatible MaterialsDimethylpolysiloxanesHydrocarbonsOilsSaltsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID32390029
PMCPMC7337324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.