Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32389935›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2020

Evaluation of Removal Behavior of Cesium in Contaminated Soil Based on Speciation Analysis.

Takahiro Sasaki, Ayano Yamashita, Norifumi Terui, Toshiaki Hattori, Shunitz Tanaka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiro SasakiFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Kanazawa, Tobetsu, Ishikari, Hokkaido, 061-0293, Japan.
Ayano YamashitaGraduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 5, Kita, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0810, Japan.
Norifumi TeruiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Ichinoseki College, Takanashi, Hagisho, Ichinoseki, Iwate 021-8511, Japan.
Toshiaki HattoriDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Information Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Hibarigaoka, Tenpaku, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8580, Japan.
Shunitz TanakaGraduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 5, Kita, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0810, Japan. shunitz@ees.hokudai.ac.jp.
Hokkaido University · JPMuroran Institute of Technology · JPNational Institute of Technology, Ichinoseki College · JPToyohashi University of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The removal efficiency of Cs from contaminated soil depends on its chemical species bound with the soil components. Therefore, in this study, we observed the elution behavior of Cs based on speciation analysis in a Cs removal experiment conducted on contaminated soils. The treatment method was optimized using simulated contaminated soil and applied to actual contaminated soil on a large scale as well. The elution rate of Cs was approximately 50% or more in both actual and simulated contaminated soil using the optimized treatment method. From the obtained results, a robust treatment method using an eluting reagent and a magnetic adsorbent with low energy costs is proposed. Additionally, the usefulness of speciation analysis in decontamination studies was confirmed.

Indexed as

Cs-contaminated soilremoval behaviorsequential extraction proceduresSpeciation analysis

Identifiers

PMID32389935
OpenAlexW3023824693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.