Trial reportJournal of pain and symptom management2020
Patient-Reported Receipt of Goal-Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Outpatients-Prevalence and Associated Factors.
Trial report in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Goal Concordance in the Advancing Symptom Alleviation with Palliative Treatment Clinical Trial of a Nurse and Social Worker Palliative Telecare Team Intervention.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Trial
- Seriously Ill Patients' Prioritized Goals and Their Clinicians' Perceptions of Those Goals.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2022Trial
- From Patient Voice to Organizational Adaptability: A Critical Narrative Review and Conceptual Model for Personalized Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Serious Illness and Health Care Threats to Personal Legacy Goals.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
- Time-limited trials for acute dialysis decision-making for critically ill older patients: rationale, communication strategies, and future research.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026Review
- Article
- Patient-Centered Measures of Goal Concordance in Geriatrics and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Measuring Goal-Concordant Care Using Electronic Clinical Notes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Review
- Leveraging the electronic health record to identify delivery of goal-concordant care.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Achieving goal-concordant care: Formal and informal advance care planning for White, Black, and Hispanic older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- End-of-Life Issues in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2023Article
- Determining Goal Concordant Care in the Intensive Care Unit Using Electronic Health Records.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023Article
- Preferences and Attitudes Towards Life-Sustaining Treatments of Older Chinese Patients and Their Family Caregivers.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextGoal-concordant care is an important indicator of high-quality care in serious illness.
objectivesTo estimate the prevalence of patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care among seriously ill outpatients and identify factors associated with the absence of patient-reported goal concordance.
methodsAnalysis of enrollment surveys from a multicenter cluster-randomized trial of outpatients with serious illness. Patients reported their prioritized health care goal and the focus of their current medical care; these items were matched to define receipt of goal-concordant care.
resultsOf 405 patients with a prioritized health care goal, 58% reported receipt of goal-concordant care, 17% goal-discordant care, and 25% were uncertain of the focus of their care. Patient-reported receipt of goal concordance differed by patient goal. For patients who prioritized extending life, 86% reported goal-concordant care, 2% goal-discordant care, and 12% were uncertain of the focus of their care. For patients who prioritized relief of pain and discomfort, 51% reported goal-concordant care, 21% goal-discordant care, and 28% were uncertain of the focus of their care. Patients who prioritized a goal of relief of pain and discomfort were more likely to report goal-discordant care than patients who prioritized a goal of extending life (relative risk ratio 22.20; 95% CI 4.59, 107.38).
conclusionSeriously ill outpatients who prioritize a goal of relief of pain and discomfort are less likely to report receipt of goal-concordant care than patients who prioritize extending life. Future interventions designed to improve receipt of goal-concordant care should focus on identifying patients who prioritize relief of pain and discomfort and promoting care aligned with that goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.