Trial reportValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2020
Quantifying Downstream Healthcare Utilization in Studies of Genomic Testing.
Trial report in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02422511 (Genomic Sequencing for Childhood Risk and Newborn Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genomic Sequencing for Childhood Risk and Newborn Illness (The BabySeq Project)
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Data-Related and Methodological Challenges in Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Traditional and Genomic Newborn Screening Programs.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- Designing inclusive newborn sequencing research: insights from parents in underrepresented communities.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants.Pediatrics · 2024Article
- The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Ensuring best practice in genomics education: A scoping review of genomics education needs assessments and evaluations.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Early-stage economic analysis of research-based comprehensive genomic sequencing for advanced cancer care.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences with Population Genetic Testing Offered Through a Primary Care Network.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2021Article
- Clinical utility of genomic sequencing: a measurement toolkit.NPJ genomic medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe challenges of understanding how interventions influence follow-up medical care are magnified during genomic testing because few patients have received it to date and because the scope of information it provides is complex and often unexpected. We tested a novel strategy for quantifying downstream healthcare utilization after genomic testing to more comprehensively and efficiently identify related services. We also evaluated the effectiveness of different methods for collecting these data.
methodsWe developed a risk-based approach for a trial of newborn genomic sequencing in which we defined primary conditions based on existing diagnoses and family histories of disease and defined secondary conditions based on unexpected findings. We then created patient-specific lists of services associated with managing primary and secondary conditions. Services were quantified based on medical record reviews, surveys, and telephone check-ins with parents.
resultsBy focusing on services that genomic testing would most likely influence in the short-term, we reduced the number of services in our analyses by more than 90% compared with analyses of all observed services. We also identified the same services that were ordered in response to unexpected findings as were identified during expert review and by confirming whether recommendations were completed. Data also showed that quantifying healthcare utilization with surveys and telephone check-ins alone would have missed the majority of attributable services.
conclusionsOur risk-based strategy provides an improved approach for assessing the short-term impact of genomic testing and other interventions on healthcare utilization while conforming as much as possible to existing best-practice recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.