Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32389220›Full record

Trial reportValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2020

Quantifying Downstream Healthcare Utilization in Studies of Genomic Testing.

Zoë P Mackay, Dmitry Dukhovny, Kathryn A Phillips, Alan H Beggs, Robert C Green, Richard B Parad, Kurt D Christensen, BabySeq Project Team

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02422511 (Genomic Sequencing for Childhood Risk and Newborn Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02422511 nacompletednot on this map

Genomic Sequencing for Childhood Risk and Newborn Illness (The BabySeq Project)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2015 to 2021Enrolled1,205ConditionsHereditary Disease, Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseArmsGenomic sequencing, Family history report
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zoë P MackayBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Dmitry DukhovnyDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Kathryn A PhillipsCenter for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Philip R Lee Institute for Health Policy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alan H BeggsHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert C GreenHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard B ParadHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kurt D ChristensenHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Precision Medicine Translational Research Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: kurt_christensen@harvardpilgrim.org.
BabySeq Project Team

Funding

Sharing Aggregate Genomics Research Findings with Diverse Participants: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Design StrategyU01HG009599 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOENIG, BARBARA A., KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2017 to 2021
$16.3M
Genome Sequence-Based Screening for Childhood Risk and Newborn IllnessU19HD077671 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEGGS, ALAN H., GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2013 to 2018
$6.1M
Coverage, Price, and Reimbursement for Multigene Tests for Cancer and Related ConditionsR01CA221870 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PHILLIPS, KATHRYN A · 2018 to 2020
$2.2M
Cost-effectiveness of Whole Genome Sequencing of Healthy AdultsK01HG009173 · NHGRI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI CHRISTENSEN, KURT DEREK · 2016 to 2020
$626k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA221870NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG009173NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009599NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD077671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe challenges of understanding how interventions influence follow-up medical care are magnified during genomic testing because few patients have received it to date and because the scope of information it provides is complex and often unexpected. We tested a novel strategy for quantifying downstream healthcare utilization after genomic testing to more comprehensively and efficiently identify related services. We also evaluated the effectiveness of different methods for collecting these data.

methodsWe developed a risk-based approach for a trial of newborn genomic sequencing in which we defined primary conditions based on existing diagnoses and family histories of disease and defined secondary conditions based on unexpected findings. We then created patient-specific lists of services associated with managing primary and secondary conditions. Services were quantified based on medical record reviews, surveys, and telephone check-ins with parents.

resultsBy focusing on services that genomic testing would most likely influence in the short-term, we reduced the number of services in our analyses by more than 90% compared with analyses of all observed services. We also identified the same services that were ordered in response to unexpected findings as were identified during expert review and by confirming whether recommendations were completed. Data also showed that quantifying healthcare utilization with surveys and telephone check-ins alone would have missed the majority of attributable services.

conclusionsOur risk-based strategy provides an improved approach for assessing the short-term impact of genomic testing and other interventions on healthcare utilization while conforming as much as possible to existing best-practice recommendations.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenomicsFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephonegenetic testinggenomicshealthcare utilizationhealth serviceshumansinfantmedical recordsnewbornrisk factorssurveys and questionnaireswhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32389220
PMCPMC7293136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.