Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32389122›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology2020

The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures.

Elia Guariento, Patrick Strutzenberger, Christine Truxa, Konrad Fiedler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elia GuarientoDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Patrick StrutzenbergerDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Christine TruxaDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Konrad FiedlerDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria. konrad.fiedler@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-4789-3753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'classical' concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along environmental gradients. Because of practical impediments, thus far only very few studies evaluated the performance of these diversity measures on large empirical data sets. Here, data on species-rich riparian moth communities under different flood regimes and from three different rivers has been used to compare the power of various diversity measures to uncover ecological contrasts.

resultsContrary to the expectation, classical metrics of species diversity (Hill numbers N1, N2 and N

conclusionsSpecies diversity and evenness measures turned out to be the most powerful metrics and clearly reflected both investigated environmental contrasts. This poses the question when it is useful to compile the additional data necessary for the calculation of additional diversity measures, since assembling trait bases and community phylogenies often requires a high work load. Apart from these methodological issues, most of the diversity measures related to communities of terrestrial insects like moths increased in forests that still are subject to flooding dynamics. This emphasizes the high conservation value of riparian forests and the importance of keeping and restoring river dynamics as a means of fostering also terrestrial biodiversity in floodplain areas.

Indexed as

BiodiversityForestsAnimalsInsectaPhylogenyRiversCommunity pattern analysisDiversity metricsMothsNear-annual inundationsRiparian forest

Identifiers

PMID32389122
PMCPMC7211340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.