Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32389119›Full record

ArticleCurrent radiopharmaceuticals2020

In situ Generated

Vilde Y Stenberg, Asta Juzeniene, Øyvind S Bruland, Roy H Larsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current radiopharmaceuticals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Experimental Generator for Production of High-PurityJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Advances inPharmaceutics · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Review
  14. Dual targeting withFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Targeted alpha therapy with theFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Evaluation of the PSMA-Binding LigandInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vilde Y StenbergDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Asta JuzenieneDepartment of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Øyvind S BrulandInstitute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Roy H LarsenNucligen AS, Oslo, Norway
Oslo University Hospital · NOActigen (Norway) · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew treatments combating bone and extraskeletal metastases are needed for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The majority of metastases overexpress prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), making it an ideal candidate for targeted radionuclide therapy.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to test a novel liquid 224Ra/212Pb-generator for the rapid preparation of a dual-alpha targeting solution. Here, PSMA-targeting ligands are labelled with 212Pb in the 224Ra-solution in transient equilibrium with daughter nuclides. Thus, natural bone-seeking 224Ra targeting sclerotic bone metastases and 212Pb-chelated PSMA ligands targeting PSMA-expressing tumour cells are obtained.

methodsTwo PSMA-targeting ligands, the p-SCN-Bn-TCMC-PSMA ligand (NG001), specifically developed for chelating 212Pb, and the most clinically used DOTA-based PSMA-617 were labelled with 212Pb. Radiolabelling and targeting potential were investigated in situ, in vitro (PSMA-positive C4-2 human prostate cancer cells) and in vivo (athymic mice bearing C4-2 xenografts).

resultsNG001 was rapidly labelled with 212Pb (radiochemical purity >94% at concentrations of ≥15 μg/ml) using the liquid 224Ra/212Pb-generator. The high radiochemical purity and stability of [212Pb]Pb- NG001 were demonstrated over 48 hours in the presence of ascorbic acid and albumin. Similar binding abilities of the 212Pb-labelled ligands were observed in C4-2 cells. The PSMA ligands displayed comparable tumour uptake after 2 hours, but NG001 showed a 3.5-fold lower kidney uptake than PSMA- 617. Radium-224 was not chelated and, hence, showed high uptake in bones.

conclusionA fast method for the labelling of PSMA ligands with 212Pb in the 224Ra/212Pb-solution was developed. Thus, further in vivo studies with dual tumour targeting by alpha-particles are warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalHumansLead RadioisotopesLigandsMaleMiceMice, NudeProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiumThoriumLead-212Lead RadioisotopesLigandsProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiumThoriumthorium X212Pb224Ra/212Pb-liquid generatormetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerNG001PSMA-617targeted alpha therapyTCMC

Identifiers

PMID32389119
PMCPMC7527546
OpenAlexW3023489917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.