ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2020
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Re-tear and Revision Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature Athlete.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Over-the-Top Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Pediatric Athletes Provides Excellent Functional Outcomes and Preserves Growth Plate Symmetry.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Hybrid Over-the-Top Femoral Fixation, Transphyseal Tibial Fixation, and Tibial All-Epiphyseal Anterolateral Ligament Fixation Using Attached Hamstring Autograft.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Chinese expert consensus on failure and revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Instrumented gait analysis post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in pediatric patients: A non-invasive method for quantifying the static and dynamic leg axis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Graft Failure and Contralateral ACL Injuries After Primary ACL Reconstruction: An Analysis of Risk Factors Using Interpretable Machine Learning.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in Pediatric ACL Reconstruction: Graft Dimensions and Prediction of Size on Preoperative MRI.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Anatomic all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction with "inside-out" femoral tunnel placement in immature patients yields high return to sport rates and functional outcome scores a minimum of 24 months after reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Towards Standardization in the Diagnostic Evaluation of ACL Injuries in Skeletally Immature Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWith an increase in high-demand sporting activity, the rate of pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing. Yet, the failure rates after reconstruction are much higher than the adult population. The purpose of this paper is to understand failure rates, reasons for graft failure, and strategies for successful revision surgery. RECENT
findingsA complete understanding of the failure etiology is essential for the clinician treating this population prior to revision. This begins with an assessment of post-operative patient compliance and sporting activity. Surgical technique must then be scrutinized for non-anatomic tunnel placement and poor graft size/type. Concurrent bony deformity must also be addressed including lower extremity valgus alignment and tibial slope abnormalities. Meniscus and chondral injury must be aggressively treated. Furthermore, imaging must be examined to look for missed posterolateral corner injury. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (in the setting of ligamentous laxity or rotational instability) may be also indicated as well. The surgeon can then choose a graft type and surgical technique that optimizes outcome and respects skeletal growth. Prior to surgical intervention, the clinician must also counsel patients in regard to the guarded prognosis and outcomes in this setting. Prolonged rehabilitation protocols/return-to-play timing as well as sporting activity modification in the post-operative period after revision are critical. There is limited literature on revision ACL reconstruction in the skeletally immature athlete. An understanding of all the risk factors for failure is essential in order to achieve treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.