ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2020
Using Patient Engagement Platforms in the Postoperative Management of Patients.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Perioperative application of chatbots: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Pooled it
- Operating Room Performance Optimization Metrics: a Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2023Pooled it
- Heterogeneity in decision-making engagement among total knee arthroplasty patients in China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- High Patient Satisfaction with a Digital Care Platform After Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: A Registry-Based Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- User Experiences of a Chatbot for Supporting the Self-Management of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Chemotherapy: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Overall Satisfaction of Patents Enrolled in an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chatbot Following Periacetabular Osteotomy.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of Hoopicoach: A digital health tool for supporting patients through gynecologic surgery.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Observational
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- [Research progress in application of intelligent remote follow-up mode in hip and knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Medicine: Chatbots as Catalysts for Improved Diagnosis, Treatment, and Patient Support.Cureus · 2025Review
- Moderate burden amongst caregivers posthip arthroscopy linked to younger caregiver age and task load: A cross-sectional survey study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Conversational Engagement Using a Short Message Service Chatbot After Total Joint Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Patient Engagement Platforms: How Technology Is Impacting Perioperative Communication and Engagement in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Impact of a Remote Patient Monitoring Platform on Outcomes Following a Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Designing for Improved Patient Experiences in Home Dialysis: Usability and User Experience Findings From User-Based Evaluation Study With Patients With Chronic Conditions.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Racial Differences in Perioperative Complications, Readmissions, and Mortalities After Elective Spine Surgery in the United States: A Systematic Review Using AI-Assisted Bibliometric Analysis.Global spine journal · 2024Article
- Effects of User-Reported Risk Factors and Follow-Up Care Activities on Satisfaction With a COVID-19 Chatbot: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Role of ChatGPT in health science and research: A correspondence addressing potential application.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Bariatric Patient Engagement in a Pre-surgery Virtual Patient Navigation Platform (VPNP).Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Complication Rates of Mandibular Fractures Caused by Violent Mechanisms Versus Nonviolent Mechanisms.Eplasty · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to contextualize the topic of patient engagement in orthopedic surgery. There will be a specific focus on patient engagement platforms and the impact on outcomes and orthopedic clinical workflows. RECENT
findingsIn an attempt to engage patients and optimize the orthopedic perioperative surgical home, patient engagement platforms have emerged in the form of portals, mobile health applications, and chatbots. Collectively, these platforms have improved patient satisfaction scores and outcomes. Patient portals, mobile health applications, and chatbots can engage orthopedic patients and improve the effectiveness of the perioperative orthopedic surgical home. There are specific differences in these applications that should be noted and accounted for. When deciding to incorporate one of these systems into your practice, it is paramount to identify what you are looking to improve upon within your health system and choose a platform accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.